The new enhancement technologies and the place of vulnerability in our lives

Journal article


Quilter, John G.. (2016). The new enhancement technologies and the place of vulnerability in our lives. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 37(1), pp. 9 - 27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9354-z
AuthorsQuilter, John G.
Abstract

What is the place of vulnerability in our lives? The current debate about the ethics of enhancement technologies provides a context in which to think about this question. In my view, the current debate is likely to be fruitless, largely because we bring the wrong ethical resources to bear on its questions. In this article, I recall an important, but currently neglected, role that moral concepts play in our thinking, a role they should especially play in relation to the introduction of new technologies. I call this the ‘contemplative role of moral concepts’. I then contrast two approaches to the contemplative role of moral concepts which are found in the current literature, and show why it is important to keep in mind both of these approaches when thinking about human vulnerability.

KeywordsVulnerability; Enhancement; Moral concepts; Ethics of flourishing; Ethics of renunciation
Year2016
JournalTheoretical Medicine and Bioethics
Journal citation37 (1), pp. 9 - 27
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
ISSN1386-7415
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9354-z
Scopus EID2-s2.0-84959478837
Page range9 - 27
Research GroupSchool of Philosophy
Publisher's version
File Access Level
Controlled
Place of publicationNetherlands
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/85432/the-new-enhancement-technologies-and-the-place-of-vulnerability-in-our-lives

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 103
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Contestation of the ends of higher education and the disciplinary voice
Quilter, John Gerard. (2017). Contestation of the ends of higher education and the disciplinary voice. In Civil Society, Education and Human Formation: Philosophy's Role in a Renewed Understanding of Education pp. 196-208 Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315199405
The nature of religious dialogue, the diversity argument and religious pluralism
Quilter, John G.. (2016). The nature of religious dialogue, the diversity argument and religious pluralism. In In Tālivaldis Ozoliņš, Jānis (Ed.). Religion and culture in dialogue : East and West perspectives pp. 59-76 Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-25724-2_5
Questioning the gods? Religious diversity and atheism in public life?
Quilter, John G.. (2012). Questioning the gods? Religious diversity and atheism in public life? Uniting Church Studies. 18(2), pp. 91 - 103.
Some ethical questions about the transfer of enrolments from government to private schools in Australia: What are the factors for this trend and what is to be made ethically of the trend?
Stolz, Steven and Quilter, John. (2008). Some ethical questions about the transfer of enrolments from government to private schools in Australia: What are the factors for this trend and what is to be made ethically of the trend? Ethics Education: a journal for applied philosophy and ethics in the Christian tradition. 14(1), pp. 4 - 24.
Moral responsibility; luck and the penal lottery
Quilter, John. (2006). Moral responsibility; luck and the penal lottery. Ethics Education: a journal for applied philosophy and ethics in the Christian tradition. 12(2), pp. 22 - 26.
The Notion of Achievement in Sport and some Ethical Issues in Professional Sport
Quilter, John Gerard. (2005). The Notion of Achievement in Sport and some Ethical Issues in Professional Sport. In Dr Stephen Coleman (special issue) and General Editor- Dr Andrew Alexandra (Ed.). 2004 Conference of the Australian Association for Professional and Applied Ethics. Canberra, Australia: Centre for Applied Philosophy and Public Ethics.
Why do they hate us, thick and thin?
Quilter, John. (2005). Why do they hate us, thick and thin? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics. 26(3), pp. 241 - 260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-005-3982-z
Meaning; faith and reason: Is metaphysics the way?
Quilter, John Gerard. (2004). Meaning; faith and reason: Is metaphysics the way? In In A. Fisher OP and H. Ramsay (Ed.). Faith and Reason: Friends or Foes in the New Millennium pp. 300 - 335 Australian Theological Forum Press.