Rossian pluralism, egoism, and pleasure
Journal article
Crisp, Roger. (2016). Rossian pluralism, egoism, and pleasure. Etica & politica. 18(1), pp. 119 - 133.
Authors | Crisp, Roger |
---|---|
Abstract | In this paper I register disagreement with Katarzyna de Lazari-Radek and Peter Singer on three significant issues. First, Sidgwick does not give utilitarianism the advantage over Ros-sian pluralistic intuitionism. Both views are still very much in the running. Second, his du-alism survives their evolutionary argument. The egoist principle is no more or less vulner-able to debunking than the principle of impartial benevolence. Third, though his view on pleasure is not entirely clear, Sidgwick is best understood to be offering a traditional ‘feel-ing-tone’ account of pleasure, rather than a view which gives a significant role to the ‘ap-prehension’ of the subject. |
Keywords | Sidgwick; Henry; utilitarianism; intuitionism; dualism of practical reason; pleasure |
Year | 2016 |
Journal | Etica & politica |
Journal citation | 18 (1), pp. 119 - 133 |
Publisher | Universita degli Studi di Trieste |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-84990246617 |
Web address (URL) | http://www2.units.it/etica/2016_1/CRISP.pdf |
Open access | Open access |
Page range | 119 - 133 |
Research Group | Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry |
Publisher's version | License |
Place of publication | Italy |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/855y2/rossian-pluralism-egoism-and-pleasure
Download files
132
total views62
total downloads2
views this month1
downloads this month