Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid
Journal article
Marsh, Herb, Bond, N. W. and Jayasinghe, U. W.. (2007). Peer review process: Assessments by applicant-nominated referees are biased, inflated, unreliable and invalid. Australian Psychologist. 42(1), pp. 33 - 38. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060600823275
Authors | Marsh, Herb, Bond, N. W. and Jayasinghe, U. W. |
---|---|
Year | 2007 |
Journal | Australian Psychologist |
Journal citation | 42 (1), pp. 33 - 38 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell |
ISSN | 0005-0067 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1080/00050060600823275 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-33846989345 |
Page range | 33 - 38 |
Research Group | Institute for Positive Psychology and Education |
Place of publication | United Kingdom |
Permalink -
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/85x47/peer-review-process-assessments-by-applicant-nominated-referees-are-biased-inflated-unreliable-and-invalid
96
total views0
total downloads2
views this month0
downloads this month