Operator arguments revisited

Journal article


Fritz, Peter, Hawthorne, John and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2019). Operator arguments revisited. Philosophical Studies. 176(11), pp. 2933 - 2959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1158-8
AuthorsFritz, Peter, Hawthorne, John and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani
Abstract

Certain passages in Kaplan’s ‘Demonstratives’ are often taken to show that non-vacuous sentential operators associated with a certain parameter of sentential truth require a corresponding relativism concerning assertoric contents: namely, their truth values also must vary with that parameter. Thus, for example, the non-vacuity of a temporal sentential operator ‘always’ would require some of its operands to have contents that have different truth values at different times. While making no claims about Kaplan’s intentions, we provide several reconstructions of how such an argument might go, focusing on the case of time and temporal operators as an illustration. What we regard as the most plausible reconstruction of the argument establishes a conclusion similar enough to that attributed to Kaplan. However, the argument overgenerates, leading to absurd consequences. We conclude that we must distinguish assertoric contents from compositional semantic values, and argue that once they are distinguished, the argument fails to establish any substantial conclusions. We also briefly discuss a related argument commonly attributed to Lewis, and a recent variant due to Weber.

Keywordssemantics; modal logic; David Kaplan; tense logic; relativism; propositions
Year2019
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Journal citation176 (11), pp. 2933 - 2959
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
ISSN0031-8116
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1158-8
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85053810295
Page range2933 - 2959
Research GroupDianoia Institute of Philosophy
Publisher's version
File Access Level
Controlled
Place of publicationNetherlands
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/86432/operator-arguments-revisited

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 5
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Closed structure
Fritz, Peter, Lederman, Harvey and Uzquiano, Gabriel. (2021). Closed structure. Journal of Philosophical Logic. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09598-5
Counterfactual contamination
Goldstein, Simon and Hawthorne, John. (2021). Counterfactual contamination. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2021.1886129
Graded epistemic justification
Hawthorne, John and Logins, Artūrs. (2020). Graded epistemic justification. Philosophical Studies. 178(6), pp. 1845-1858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01512-0
Reply to Speaks
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2020). Reply to Speaks. Philosophical Studies. pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01553-5
Reply to Pietroski
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2020). Reply to Pietroski. Philosophical Studies. pp. 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01552-6
Reply to Byrne
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2020). Reply to Byrne. Philosophical Studies. pp. 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01551-7
Indexicality, de re belief, and narrow content : A reply to Sawyer
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2020). Indexicality, de re belief, and narrow content : A reply to Sawyer. Inquiry. pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1831852
On Stalnaker’s Simple Theory of Propositions
Fritz, Peter. (2020). On Stalnaker’s Simple Theory of Propositions. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 50, pp. 1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-020-09557-6
On higher-order logical grounds
Fritz, Peter. (2020). On higher-order logical grounds. Analysis. 80(4), p. 656–666. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anz085
Propositional quantification in Bimodal S5
Fritz, Peter. (2020). Propositional quantification in Bimodal S5. Erkenntnis. 85, pp. 455 - 465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0035-3
The necessity of mathematics
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2020). The necessity of mathematics. Noûs. 54(3), pp. 549 - 577. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12268
Pragmatic Encroachment and Closure
Anderson, Charity and Hawthorne, John. (2019). Pragmatic Encroachment and Closure. In In B. Kim and M. McGrath (Ed.). Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology pp. 107 - 115 Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315168197
Knowledge of objective modality
Strohminger, Margot and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2019). Knowledge of objective modality. Philosophical Studies. 176(5), pp. 1155 - 1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1052-4
Possible Patterns
Russell, Jeffrey Sanford and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Possible Patterns. In In K. Bennett and D. W. Zimmerman (Ed.). Oxford Studies in Metaphysics pp. 149 - 193 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198828198.003.0005
Narrow content
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Narrow content Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.001.0001
Reflections on the Ideology of Reasons
Hawthorne, John and Magidor, Ofra. (2018). Reflections on the Ideology of Reasons. In In D. Star (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity pp. 113 - 142 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.6
Fine-tuning Fine-tuning
Hawthorne, John and Isaacs, Yoaav. (2018). Fine-tuning Fine-tuning. In In M. A. Bentone, J. Hawthorne and D. Rabinowitz (Ed.). Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology pp. 136 - 168 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198798705.003.0008
Narrow content and ur-content
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Narrow content and ur-content. In Narrow Content pp. 72 - 105 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0004
Higher-Order contingentism, Part 2: Patterns of indistinguishability
Fritz, Peter. (2018). Higher-Order contingentism, Part 2: Patterns of indistinguishability. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 47(3), pp. 407 - 418. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-017-9432-3
Quasi-internalism
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Quasi-internalism. In Narrow Content pp. 158 - 175 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0006
Rationality and narrow content
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Rationality and narrow content. In Narrow Content pp. 130 - 157 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0005
Can modalities save naive set theory?
Fritz, Peter, Lederman, Harvey, Liu, Tiankai and Scott, Dana. (2018). Can modalities save naive set theory? Review of Symbolic Logic. 11(1), pp. 21 - 47. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020317000168
Higher-Order contingentism, Part 3: Expressive limitations
Fritz, Peter. (2018). Higher-Order contingentism, Part 3: Expressive limitations. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 47(4), pp. 649 - 671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-017-9443-0
Moderate modal skepticism
Strohminger, Margot and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2018). Moderate modal skepticism. In In M. A. Benton, J. Hawthorne and D. Rabinowitz (Ed.). Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology pp. 302 - 321 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198798705.003.0016
Truth-conditionality
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Truth-conditionality. In Narrow Content pp. 63 - 97 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0003
Semantic externalism without thought experiments
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2018). Semantic externalism without thought experiments. Analysis. 78(1), pp. 81 - 89. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx127
What is narrow content?
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). What is narrow content? In Narrow Content pp. 1 - 46 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0002
Misapprehensions about the fine-tuning argument
Hawthorne, John and Isaacs, Yoaav. (2017). Misapprehensions about the fine-tuning argument. Religious Epistemology. 81, pp. 133 - 155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246117000297
Logics for propositional contingentism
Fritz, Peter. (2017). Logics for propositional contingentism. The Review of Symbolic Logic. 10(2), pp. 203 - 236. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020317000028
A purely recombinatorial puzzle
Fritz, Peter. (2017). A purely recombinatorial puzzle. Noûs. 51(3), pp. 547 - 564. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12172
Counting incompossibles
Fritz, Peter and Goodman, Jeremy. (2017). Counting incompossibles. Mind. 126(504), pp. 1063 - 1108. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzw026
Counterfactuals and propositional contingentism
Fritz, Peter and Goodman, Jeremy. (2017). Counterfactuals and propositional contingentism. Review of Symbolic Logic. 10(3), pp. 509 - 529. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020317000144
The epistemology of modality
Strohminger, Margot and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2017). The epistemology of modality. Analysis. 77(4), pp. 825 - 838. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx058
Epistemicism and modality
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2016). Epistemicism and modality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 46(4-5), pp. 803 - 835. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1201878
Higher-order free logic and the prior-Kaplan paradox
Bacon, Andrew, Hawthorne, John and Uzquiano, Gabriel. (2016). Higher-order free logic and the prior-Kaplan paradox. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 46(4-5), pp. 493 - 541. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1201387
Propositional contingentism
Fritz, Peter. (2016). Propositional contingentism. Review of Symbolic Logic. 9(1), pp. 123 - 142. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020315000325
Higher-Order contingentism, Part 1: Closure and generation
Fritz, Peter and Goodman, Jeremy. (2016). Higher-Order contingentism, Part 1: Closure and generation. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 45(6), pp. 645 - 695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9388-0
Belief is weak
Hawthorne, John, Rothschild, Daniel and Spectre, Levi. (2016). Belief is weak. Philosophical Studies. 173(5), pp. 1393 - 1404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0553-7
First-order modal logic in the necessary framework of objects
Fritz, Peter. (2016). First-order modal logic in the necessary framework of objects. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 46(4-5), pp. 584 - 609. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2015.1132976
General dynamic trivality theorems
Russell, Jeffrey Sanford and Hawthorne, John. (2016). General dynamic trivality theorems. The Philosophical Review. 125(3), pp. 307 - 339. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-3516936
Higher-order free logic and the Prior-Kaplan paradox
Bacon, Andrew, Hawthorne, John and Uzquiano, Gabriel. (2016). Higher-order free logic and the Prior-Kaplan paradox. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 46(4-5), pp. 493 - 541. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1201387
Vagueness and modality - An ecumenical approach
Litland, Jon Erling and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2016). Vagueness and modality - An ecumenical approach. Philosophical Perspectives. 30(1), pp. 229 - 269. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12088
Some remarks on imagination and convention
Hawthorne, John. (2016). Some remarks on imagination and convention. Mind and Language. 31(5), pp. 625 - 634. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12123
Comments on transient truths: An essay in the metaphysics of propositions (Berit Brogaard)
Hawthorne, John. (2015). Comments on transient truths: An essay in the metaphysics of propositions (Berit Brogaard). Inquiry. 58(6), pp. 617 - 624. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2015.1077014
Cretan deductions
Fraser, Rachel Elizabeth and Hawthorne, John. (2015). Cretan deductions. Philosophical Perspectives. 29(1), pp. 163 - 178. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12070
Groupthink
Russell, Jeffrey Sanford, Hawthorne, John and Buchak, Lara. (2015). Groupthink. Philosophical Studies. 172(5), pp. 1287 - 1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0350-8
What is the correct logic of necessity, actuality and apriority?
Peter Fritz. (2014). What is the correct logic of necessity, actuality and apriority? Review of Symbolic Logic. 7(3), pp. 385-414. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755020314000136
Semantic plasticity and speech reports
Dorr, Cian and Hawthorne, John. (2014). Semantic plasticity and speech reports. The Philosophical Review. 123(3), pp. 281 - 338. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2683531
Semantic plasticity and speech reports
Dorr, Cian and Hawthorne, John. (2014). Semantic plasticity and speech reports. The Philosophical Review. 123(3), pp. 281 - 338. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2683531
Knowing against the odds
Dorr, Cian, Goodman, Jeremy and Hawthorne, John. (2014). Knowing against the odds. Philosophical Studies. 170(2), pp. 277 - 287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0212-9