‘The Government should be ashamed’: On the possibility of organisations’ emotional duties

Journal article


Collins, Stephanie. (2018) ‘The Government should be ashamed’: On the possibility of organisations’ emotional duties. Political Studies. 66(4), pp. 813 - 829. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717739553
AuthorsCollins, Stephanie
Abstract

When we say that ‘the government should be ashamed’, can we be taken literally? I argue that we can: organisations have duties over their emotions. Emotions have both functional and felt components. Often, emotions’ moral value derives from their functional components: from what they cause and what causes them. In these cases, organisations can have emotional duties in the same way that they can have duties to act. However, emotions’ value partly derives from their felt components. Organisations lack feelings, but can have duties to increase the likelihood that their members have relevant emotions (with the right felt components), in virtue of and in accordance with their role in the organisation. To systematise these conclusions, I provide a taxonomy of organisations’ – and individuals’ organisationally situated – emotional duties. This taxonomy will enable scholars of electoral politics, international politics and public policy to systematically integrate emotions into the study of organisations.

Keywordsnormative theory; emotions; organisations; feelings; duties
Year2018
JournalPolitical Studies
Journal citation66 (4), pp. 813 - 829
PublisherSage Publications Ltd.
ISSN0032-3217
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717739553
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85041915186
Page range813 - 829
Research GroupDianoia Institute of Philosophy
Place of publicationUnited Kingdom
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/864q1/-the-government-should-be-ashamed-on-the-possibility-of-organisations-emotional-duties

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 7
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 5
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Collective Responsibility Gaps
Collins, Stephanie. (2019) Collective Responsibility Gaps. Journal of Business Ethics. 154(4), pp. 943 - 954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3890-6
When does ‘Can’ imply ‘Ought’?
Collins, Stephanie. (2018) When does ‘Can’ imply ‘Ought’? International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 26(3), pp. 354 - 375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2018.1489643
The present and the future of the Research Excellence Framework impact agenda in the UK Academy: A reflection from politics and international studies
Mhurchú, Aoileann Ní, McLeod, Laura, Collins, Stephanie and Siles-Brügge, Gabriel. (2017) The present and the future of the Research Excellence Framework impact agenda in the UK Academy: A reflection from politics and international studies. Political Studies Review. 15(1), pp. 60 - 72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916658918
Filling collective duty gaps
Collins, Stephanie. (2017) Filling collective duty gaps. Journal of Philosophy. 114(11), pp. 573 - 591. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20171141141
Responsibility for states' actions: Normative issues at the intersection of collective agency and state responsibility
Lawford-Smith, Holly and Collins, Stephanie. (2017) Responsibility for states' actions: Normative issues at the intersection of collective agency and state responsibility. Philosophy Compass. 12(11), pp. 1 - 8. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12456
The claims and duties of socioeconomic human rights
Collins, Stephanie. (2016) The claims and duties of socioeconomic human rights. The Philosophical Quarterly. 66(265), pp. 701 - 722. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqw010
The transfer of duties: From individuals to states and back again
Collins, Stephanie and Lawford-Smith, Holly. (2016) The transfer of duties: From individuals to states and back again. In In M. Brady and M. Fricker (Ed.). The epistemic life of groups: Essays in the epistemology of collectives pp. 150 - 172 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759645.003.0009
Collectives' and individuals' obligations: A parity argument
Collins, Stephanie and Lawford-Smith, Holly. (2016) Collectives' and individuals' obligations: A parity argument. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 46(1), pp. 38 - 58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2015.1116350
Distributing states' duties
Collins, Stephanie. (2016) Distributing states' duties. Journal of Political Philosophy. 24(3), pp. 344 - 366. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12069