The epistemology of modality

Journal article


Strohminger, Margot and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2017). The epistemology of modality. Analysis. 77(4), pp. 825 - 838. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx058
AuthorsStrohminger, Margot and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani
Abstract

[Extract] In this article the term ‘modality’, when unmodified, will refer to metaphysical modality. Metaphysical modality is what is expressed by ‘possible’ and variants such as ‘possibly’, as well as ‘it could have been the case that…’ and variants, when these are used in the broadest objective sense. (Metaphysical necessity is the dual of metaphysical possibility, i.e. it is metaphysically necessary that p iff it is not metaphysically possible that it is not the case that p.) Perhaps the most straightforward way to characterize objective modality is negatively: it is what the modal words express when they are not used in any epistemic or deontic sense (a more precise characterization would take us too far afield).1 Metaphysical modality is what these words express when they express objective modality and are not understood as restricted in any way. For example, ‘Trump could not have won California’ is true on various restricted objective readings, but in the completely unrestricted objective sense it could have been the case that Trump won California. In this sense, Trump could also have orbited Neptune, bicycled from Midtown Manhattan to Teotihuacán in one day, owned 17 talking donkeys, and had ever so many other extremely improbable achievements to his name; but he could not have been Hillary Clinton or any other individual actually distinct from Trump (although he could have looked, sounded, smelled, etc., exactly like Hillary Clinton and many others). The epistemology of modality inquires into the circumstances in which we can obtain knowledge that something is possibly so or necessarily so, in this sense.

Year2017
JournalAnalysis
Journal citation77 (4), pp. 825 - 838
PublisherOxford University Press
ISSN0003-2638
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx058
Page range825 - 838
Research GroupDianoia Institute of Philosophy
Publisher's version
File Access Level
Controlled
Place of publicationUnited Kingdom
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/86680/the-epistemology-of-modality

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 89
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

LF : A foundational higher-order logic
Goodsell, Zachary and Yli-Vakkuri, Tuomo Juhani. (2024). LF : A foundational higher-order logic. PsyArXiv Preprints. 1, pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2401.11050
Challenges for an experimentalist's skepticism about cases
Strohminger, Margot and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2023). Challenges for an experimentalist's skepticism about cases. In In Vaidya, Anand and Prelević, Duško (Ed.). Epistemology of modality and philosophical methodology pp. 338-358 Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003002192-19
Counterpart theory and counterfactuals
Hawthorne, John and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2023). Counterpart theory and counterfactuals. In In Bennett, Karen and Zimmerman, Dean W. (Ed.). Oxford studies in metaphysics ; volume 13 pp. 129-165 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192886033.003.0005
Intensionalism and propositional attitudes
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2022). Intensionalism and propositional attitudes. In In Kriegel, Uriah (Ed.). Oxford studies in philosophy of mind ; volume 2 pp. 114-174 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192856685.003.0005
Reply to Bourget and Mendelovici
Yli-Vakkuri, Tuomo Juhani and Hawthorne, John Patrick. (2022). Reply to Bourget and Mendelovici. Inquiry. pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2129485
Being in a position to know
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2022). Being in a position to know. Philosophical Studies. 179, pp. 1323-1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01709-x
The bounds of possibility : Puzzles of modal variation
Dorr, Cian, Hawthorne, John and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2021). The bounds of possibility : Puzzles of modal variation Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846655.001.0001
Are we free to imagine what we choose?
Munro, Daniel and Strohminger, Margot. (2021). Are we free to imagine what we choose? Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03314-1
Two ways of imagining Galileo's experiment
Strohminger, Margot. (2021). Two ways of imagining Galileo's experiment. In In Badura, Christopher and Kind, Amy (Ed.). Epistemic uses of imagination pp. 202-217 Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003041979-14
Reply to Speaks
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2021). Reply to Speaks. Philosophical Studies. 178(9), pp. 3061-3065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01553-5
Reply to Pietroski
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2021). Reply to Pietroski. Philosophical Studies. 178(9), pp. 3055-3059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01552-6
Reply to Byrne
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2021). Reply to Byrne. Philosophical Studies. 178(9), pp. 3049-3054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01551-7
Indexicality, de re belief, and narrow content : A reply to Sawyer
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2020). Indexicality, de re belief, and narrow content : A reply to Sawyer. Inquiry. pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1831852
The necessity of mathematics
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2020). The necessity of mathematics. Noûs. 54(3), pp. 549 - 577. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12268
Knowledge of objective modality
Strohminger, Margot and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2019). Knowledge of objective modality. Philosophical Studies. 176(5), pp. 1155 - 1175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1052-4
Operator arguments revisited
Fritz, Peter, Hawthorne, John and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2019). Operator arguments revisited. Philosophical Studies. 176(11), pp. 2933 - 2959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1158-8
Narrow content
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Narrow content Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.001.0001
Narrow content and ur-content
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Narrow content and ur-content. In Narrow Content pp. 72 - 105 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0004
Quasi-internalism
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Quasi-internalism. In Narrow Content pp. 158 - 175 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0006
Rationality and narrow content
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Rationality and narrow content. In Narrow Content pp. 130 - 157 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0005
Moderate modal skepticism
Strohminger, Margot and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2018). Moderate modal skepticism. In In M. A. Benton, J. Hawthorne and D. Rabinowitz (Ed.). Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology pp. 302 - 321 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198798705.003.0016
Truth-conditionality
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Truth-conditionality. In Narrow Content pp. 63 - 97 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0003
Semantic externalism without thought experiments
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2018). Semantic externalism without thought experiments. Analysis. 78(1), pp. 81 - 89. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/anx127
What is narrow content?
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). What is narrow content? In Narrow Content pp. 1 - 46 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0002
Epistemicism and modality
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2016). Epistemicism and modality. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 46(4-5), pp. 803 - 835. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1201878
Vagueness and modality - An ecumenical approach
Litland, Jon Erling and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2016). Vagueness and modality - An ecumenical approach. Philosophical Perspectives. 30(1), pp. 229 - 269. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12088
Perceptual knowledge of nonactual possibilities
Strohminger, Margot. (2015). Perceptual knowledge of nonactual possibilities. Philosophical Perspectives. 29(1), pp. 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12069