Writing history/writing about yourself: What’s the difference?
Fitzpatrick, Sheila. (2017) Writing history/writing about yourself: What’s the difference? In In D. Munro and J. Reid (Ed.). Clio’s Lives: Biographies and Autobiographies of Historians pp. 17 - 37 ANU Press. https://doi.org/10.22459/CL.10.2017
|Editors||D. Munro and J. Reid|
[Extract] According to Philippe Lejeune, writers of autobiography implicitly sign a pact with the reader to tell the truth, or at least the truth as they know it, about themselves. That is, primarily a subjective truth. As for facts, the expectation is presumably that autobiographers will convey the facts as they know or remember them, but without a necessary obligation to check their memory through documentary or other research. There is no autobiographer’s commitment to objectivity, rather the contrary. The autobiographical truth is, by definition, a subjective one.
|Keywords||biography; autobiography; history|
|Page range||17 - 37|
|Book title||Clio’s Lives: Biographies and Autobiographies of Historians|
|Place of publication||Australia|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.22459/CL.10.2017|
|Research Group||Institute for Humanities and Social Sciences|
File Access Level
1views this month
0downloads this month