The centrality of belief and reflection in Knobe-Effect cases: A unified account of the data
Alfano, Mark Robert. (2012). The centrality of belief and reflection in Knobe-Effect cases: A unified account of the data. The Monist. 95(2), pp. 264 - 289.
|Authors||Alfano, Mark Robert|
Recent work in experimental philosophy has shown that people are more likely to attribute intentionality, knowledge, and other psychological properties to someone who causes a bad side effect than to someone who causes a good one. We argue that all of these asymmetries can be explained in terms of a single underlying asymmetry involving belief attribution because the belief that one's action would result in a certain side effect is a necessary component of each of the psychological attitudes in question. We argue further that this belief-attribution asymmetry is rational because it mirrors a belief-formation asymmetry, and that the belief-formation asymmetry is also rational because it is more useful to form some beliefs than others.
|Journal citation||95 (2), pp. 264 - 289|
|Publisher||Oxford University Press|
|Page range||264 - 289|
|Research Group||Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry|
File Access Level
|Place of publication||United States of America|
0views this month
0downloads this month