The centrality of belief and reflection in Knobe-Effect cases: A unified account of the data
Journal article
Alfano, Mark Robert. (2012). The centrality of belief and reflection in Knobe-Effect cases: A unified account of the data. The Monist. 95(2), pp. 264 - 289.
Authors | Alfano, Mark Robert |
---|---|
Abstract | Recent work in experimental philosophy has shown that people are more likely to attribute intentionality, knowledge, and other psychological properties to someone who causes a bad side effect than to someone who causes a good one. We argue that all of these asymmetries can be explained in terms of a single underlying asymmetry involving belief attribution because the belief that one's action would result in a certain side effect is a necessary component of each of the psychological attitudes in question. We argue further that this belief-attribution asymmetry is rational because it mirrors a belief-formation asymmetry, and that the belief-formation asymmetry is also rational because it is more useful to form some beliefs than others. |
Year | 2012 |
Journal | The Monist |
Journal citation | 95 (2), pp. 264 - 289 |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
ISSN | 0026-9662 |
Page range | 264 - 289 |
Research Group | Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry |
Publisher's version | File Access Level Controlled |
Place of publication | United States of America |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/87w6x/the-centrality-of-belief-and-reflection-in-knobe-effect-cases-a-unified-account-of-the-data
Restricted files
Publisher's version
135
total views0
total downloads5
views this month0
downloads this month