Novak et al. reply
Journal article
Novak, Iona, McIntyre, Sarah, Morgan, Catherine, Campbell, Lanie, Dark, Leigha, Morton, Natalie, Stumbles, Elise, Wilson, Salli-Ann and Goldsmith, Shona. (2014). Novak et al. reply. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 56(4), pp. 403 - 406. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12426
Authors | Novak, Iona, McIntyre, Sarah, Morgan, Catherine, Campbell, Lanie, Dark, Leigha, Morton, Natalie, Stumbles, Elise, Wilson, Salli-Ann and Goldsmith, Shona |
---|---|
Abstract | [Extract] SIR–In responding to the letters that have been sent regarding our paper, it is clear we are all passionate about our own specialities; at the same time we believe that the optimal well-being of children with cerebral palsy (CP) must remain at the centre of this debate. We take this opportunity to state that we strongly uphold the principles of evidence-based medicine (EBM), wherein the integration of clinical expertise, client values, and best evidence is considered paramount to quality clinical decision-making. The purpose of a systematic review is to summarize the best available evidence. We provided such a summary, but this should not be misread as a clinical ‘cookbook’. We concur with EBM experts that, ‘Systematic reviews can define the boundaries of what is known and what is not known. . . Systematic reviews can aid, but can never replace, sound clinical reasoning.’ |
Year | 2014 |
Journal | Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology |
Journal citation | 56 (4), pp. 403 - 406 |
Publisher | Wiley-Blackwell |
ISSN | 0012-1622 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.12426 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-84896067901 |
Page range | 403 - 406 |
Research Group | School of Allied Health |
Publisher's version | File Access Level Controlled |
Place of publication | United Kingdom |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/889wy/novak-et-al-reply
Restricted files
Publisher's version
72
total views0
total downloads3
views this month0
downloads this month