Animal confinement and use

Journal article


Streiffer, Robert and Killoren, David. (2019) Animal confinement and use. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 49(1), pp. 1 - 21. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1534194
AuthorsStreiffer, Robert and Killoren, David
Abstract

We distinguish two conceptions of confinement – the agential conception and the comparative conception – and show that the former is intimately related to use in a way that the latter is not. Specifically, in certain conditions, agential confinement constitutes use and creates a special relationship that makes neglect or abuse especially egregious. This allows us to develop and defend an account of one important way in which agential confinement can be morally wrong. We then discuss some of the account’s practical implications, including its usefulness for decision-making in real-world contexts in which animals are confined.

KeywordsAnimal ethics; animal captivity; animal confinement; animal use; special relationships
Year2019
JournalCanadian Journal of Philosophy
Journal citation49 (1), pp. 1 - 21
PublisherTaylor & Frances
ISSN0045-5091
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2018.1534194
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85055095726
Page range1 - 21
Research GroupDianoia Institute of Philosophy
Place of publicationUnited Kingdom
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/88x43/animal-confinement-and-use

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 0
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Utilitarianism about animals and the moral significance of use
Killoren, David and Streiffer, Robert. (2020) Utilitarianism about animals and the moral significance of use. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition. 177(4), pp. 1043 - 1063. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-01229-1
A demarcation problem for political discourse
Killoren, David, Lang, Jonathan and Williams, Bekka. (2017) A demarcation problem for political discourse. In In E. Crookston, D. Killoren and J. Trerise (Ed.). Update pp. 178 - 198 Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315678443
Robust moral realism: An excellent religion
Killoren, David. (2016) Robust moral realism: An excellent religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion. 79(3), pp. 223 - 237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-015-9509-2
Why Care About Moral Fixed Points?
Killoren, David. (2016) Why Care About Moral Fixed Points? Analytic Philosophy. 57(2), pp. 165 - 173. https://doi.org/10.1111/phib.12079
Group agency and overdetermination
Killoren, David and Williams, Bekka. (2013) Group agency and overdetermination. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice. 16(2), pp. 295 - 307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-012-9336-9