Aliskiren alone or in combination with enalapril vs. Enalapril among patients with chronic heart failure with and without diabetes: a subgroup analysis from the ATMOSPHERE trial
Journal article
Kristensen, Søren L., Mogensen, Ulrik M., Tarnesby, Georgia, Gimpelewicz, Claudio, Ali, Mohammed A., Shao, Qing, Chiang, Yanntong, Jhund, Pardeep, Abraham, William T., Dickstein, Kenneth, McMurray, John and Kober, Lars. (2018). Aliskiren alone or in combination with enalapril vs. Enalapril among patients with chronic heart failure with and without diabetes: a subgroup analysis from the ATMOSPHERE trial. European Journal of Heart Failure. 20(1), pp. 136 - 147. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.896
Authors | Kristensen, Søren L., Mogensen, Ulrik M., Tarnesby, Georgia, Gimpelewicz, Claudio, Ali, Mohammed A., Shao, Qing, Chiang, Yanntong, Jhund, Pardeep, Abraham, William T., Dickstein, Kenneth, McMurray, John and Kober, Lars |
---|---|
Abstract | Aims: Because of concerns about the safety of aliskiren in patients with diabetes, study treatment was stopped prematurely in the Aliskiren Trial of Minimizing OutcomeS for Patients with HEart failuRE (ATMOSPHERE). We examined outcomes and treatment effect in these patients compared with those without diabetes. Methods and results: ATMOSPHERE included 7016 patients with heart failure and a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) randomly assigned to enalapril plus aliskiren, aliskiren alone, or enalapril. At baseline, 1944 (27.7%) patients had diabetes. Median follow-up was shorter in patients with diabetes compared with those without (24 months vs. 46 months). Among patients with diabetes, the primary endpoint of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure occurred in 216 patients (33.1%) in the enalapril group (reference), 172 (27.4%) in the aliskiren group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.82, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–1.00; P = 0.053], and 196 (29.5%) in the combination group (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.71–1.04; P = 0.13). The effects of the treatments studied did not differ significantly compared with patients without diabetes. In patients with diabetes, aliskiren monotherapy was associated with a lower risk of symptomatic hypotension compared to enalapril [42 (6.7%) vs. 65 (10.0%); P = 0.04], whereas other adverse events were generally balanced between the three groups. Conclusion: In patients with HFrEF and diabetes, there was no signal of harm and a trend towards benefit when direct renin inhibition monotherapy was compared with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor, whereas combined aliskiren and enalapril treatment led to more adverse events with no improvement in outcomes. Treatment effects did not differ in patients with diabetes compared with those without. |
Year | 2018 |
Journal | European Journal of Heart Failure |
Journal citation | 20 (1), pp. 136 - 147 |
Publisher | John Wiley & Sons Ltd |
ISSN | 1388-9842 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.896 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-85030468342 |
Page range | 136 - 147 |
Research Group | Mary MacKillop Institute for Health Research |
Publisher's version | File Access Level Controlled |
Place of publication | United Kingdom |
Editors | M. Metra |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/89wq1/aliskiren-alone-or-in-combination-with-enalapril-vs-enalapril-among-patients-with-chronic-heart-failure-with-and-without-diabetes-a-subgroup-analysis-from-the-atmosphere-trial
Restricted files
Publisher's version
106
total views0
total downloads6
views this month0
downloads this month