Collective Responsibility Gaps

Journal article


Collins, Stephanie 2019. Collective Responsibility Gaps. Journal of Business Ethics. 154 (4), pp. 943 - 954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3890-6
AuthorsCollins, Stephanie
Abstract

Which kinds of responsibility can we attribute to which kinds of collective, and why? In contrast, which kinds of collective responsibility can we not attribute—which kinds are ‘gappy’? This study provides a framework for answering these questions. It begins by distinguishing between three kinds of collective (diffuse, teleological, and agential) and three kinds of responsibility (causal, moral, and prospective). It then explains how gaps—i.e. cases where we cannot attribute the responsibility we might want to—appear to arise within each type of collective responsibility. It argues some of these gaps do not exist on closer inspection, at least for some collectives and some of the time.

KeywordsCollective responsibility; Collective agency; Responsibility gaps; Causation; Blame; Duty
Year2019
JournalJournal of Business Ethics
Journal citation154 (4), pp. 943 - 954
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
ISSN0167-4544
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3890-6
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85046401255
Open accessOpen access
Page range943 - 954
Research GroupDianoia Institute of Philosophy
Publisher's version
License
Place of publicationNetherlands
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/89z49/collective-responsibility-gaps

Download files


Publisher's version
  • 0
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month

Export as

Related outputs

When does ‘Can’ imply ‘Ought’?
Collins, Stephanie 2018. When does ‘Can’ imply ‘Ought’? International Journal of Philosophical Studies. 26 (3), pp. 354 - 375. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2018.1489643
‘The Government should be ashamed’: On the possibility of organisations’ emotional duties
Collins, Stephanie 2018. ‘The Government should be ashamed’: On the possibility of organisations’ emotional duties. Political Studies. 66 (4), pp. 813 - 829. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321717739553
The present and the future of the Research Excellence Framework impact agenda in the UK Academy: A reflection from politics and international studies
Mhurchú, Aoileann Ní, McLeod, Laura, Collins, Stephanie and Siles-Brügge, Gabriel 2017. The present and the future of the Research Excellence Framework impact agenda in the UK Academy: A reflection from politics and international studies. Political Studies Review. 15 (1), pp. 60 - 72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478929916658918
Filling collective duty gaps
Collins, Stephanie 2017. Filling collective duty gaps. Journal of Philosophy. 114 (11), pp. 573 - 591. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil20171141141
Responsibility for states' actions: Normative issues at the intersection of collective agency and state responsibility
Lawford-Smith, Holly and Collins, Stephanie 2017. Responsibility for states' actions: Normative issues at the intersection of collective agency and state responsibility. Philosophy Compass. 12 (11), pp. 1 - 8. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12456
The claims and duties of socioeconomic human rights
Collins, Stephanie 2016. The claims and duties of socioeconomic human rights. The Philosophical Quarterly. 66 (265), pp. 701 - 722. https://doi.org/10.1093/pq/pqw010
The transfer of duties: From individuals to states and back again
Collins, Stephanie and Lawford-Smith, Holly 2016. The transfer of duties: From individuals to states and back again. in: M. Brady and M. Fricker (ed.) The epistemic life of groups: Essays in the epistemology of collectives United States of America: Oxford University Press. pp. 150 - 172
Collectives' and individuals' obligations: A parity argument
Collins, Stephanie and Lawford-Smith, Holly 2016. Collectives' and individuals' obligations: A parity argument. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 46 (1), pp. 38 - 58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2015.1116350
Distributing states' duties
Collins, Stephanie 2016. Distributing states' duties. Journal of Political Philosophy. 24 (3), pp. 344 - 366. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopp.12069