Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures

Journal article


Austin, Matthew S., Yang, Yu-Ching, Vittinghoff, Eric, Adami, Silvano, Boonen, Steven, Bauer, Douglas C., Bianchi, Gerolamo and Bolognese, Michael A.. (2012). Relationship between bone mineral density changes with denosumab treatment and risk reduction for vertebral and nonvertebral fractures. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 27(3), pp. 687 - 693. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1472
AuthorsAustin, Matthew S., Yang, Yu-Ching, Vittinghoff, Eric, Adami, Silvano, Boonen, Steven, Bauer, Douglas C., Bianchi, Gerolamo and Bolognese, Michael A.
Abstract

Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometric bone mineral density (DXA BMD) is a strong predictor of fracture risk in untreated patients. However, previous patient-level studies suggest that BMD changes explain little of the fracture risk reduction observed with osteoporosis treatment. We investigated the relevance of DXA BMD changes as a predictor for fracture risk reduction using data from the FREEDOM trial, which randomly assigned placebo or denosumab 60 mg every 6 months to 7808 women aged 60 to 90 years with a spine or total hip BMD T-score  <  −2.5 and not  <  −4.0. We took a standard approach to estimate the percent of treatment effect explained using percent changes in BMD at a single visit (months 12, 24, or 36). We also applied a novel approach using estimated percent changes in BMD from baseline at the time of fracture occurrence (time-dependent models). Denosumab significantly increased total hip BMD by 3.2%, 4.4%, and 5.0% at 12, 24, and 36 months, respectively. Denosumab decreased the risk of new vertebral fractures by 68% (p  <  0.0001) and nonvertebral fracture by 20% (p = 0.01) over 36 months. Regardless of the method used, the change in total hip BMD explained a considerable proportion of the effect of denosumab in reducing new or worsening vertebral fracture risk (35% [95% confidence interval (CI): 20%–61%] and 51% [95% CI: 39%–66%] accounted for by percent change at month 36 and change in time-dependent BMD, respectively) and explained a considerable amount of the reduction in nonvertebral fracture risk (87% [95% CI: 35% – > 100%] and 72% [95% CI: 24% – > 100%], respectively). Previous patient-level studies may have underestimated the strength of the relationship between BMD change and the effect of treatment on fracture risk or this relationship may be unique to denosumab. © 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research

Keywordsdenosumab; bone mineral density; fracture; surrogate; percent of treatment effect explained
Year2012
JournalJournal of Bone and Mineral Research
Journal citation27 (3), pp. 687 - 693
PublisherAmerican Society for Bone and Mineral Research
ISSN0884-0431
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1472
Open accessOpen access
Page range687 - 693
Research GroupInstitute for Health and Ageing
Publisher's version
Place of publicationUnited States of America
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8q843/relationship-between-bone-mineral-density-changes-with-denosumab-treatment-and-risk-reduction-for-vertebral-and-nonvertebral-fractures

  • 46
    total views
  • 69
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as