Are all reasons causes?

Journal article


Dietz, Christina. (2016). Are all reasons causes? Philosophical Studies. 173(5), pp. 1179 - 1190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0523-0
AuthorsDietz, Christina
Abstract

In this paper, I revisit the Davidsonian thesis that all reasons are causes. Drawing on a better taxonomy of reasons than the one Davidson provides, I argue that this thesis is either indefensible or uninteresting.

KeywordsReasons; Action; Causes; Explanation
Year2016
JournalPhilosophical Studies
Journal citation173 (5), pp. 1179 - 1190
PublisherSpringer Netherlands
ISSN0031-8116
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0523-0
Scopus EID2-s2.0-84938651405
Page range1179 - 1190
Research GroupDianoia Institute of Philosophy
Publisher's version
File Access Level
Controlled
Place of publicationNetherlands
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8qvy5/are-all-reasons-causes

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 66
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Recognition
Dietz, Christina. (2022). Recognition. Erkenntnis. pp. 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-022-00598-8
Emotions, evidence, and safety
Dietz, Christina H.. (2020). Emotions, evidence, and safety. Synthese. pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02871-1
Doxastic cognitivism : An anti-intellectualist theory of emotion
Dietz, Christina H.. (2020). Doxastic cognitivism : An anti-intellectualist theory of emotion. Philosophical Perspectives. 34(1), pp. 27-52. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12135
Reasons and factive emotions
Dietz, Christina. (2018). Reasons and factive emotions. Philosophical Studies. 175(7), pp. 1681 - 1691. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-017-0929-y