How valid are subjective ratings of prospective memory in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia?
Thompson, Claire, Henry, Julie, Rendell, Peter, Withall, Adrienne and Brodaty, Henry. (2015). How valid are subjective ratings of prospective memory in mild cognitive impairment and early dementia? Gerontology. 61(3), pp. 251 - 257. https://doi.org/10.1159/000371347
|Authors||Thompson, Claire, Henry, Julie, Rendell, Peter, Withall, Adrienne and Brodaty, Henry|
Background: Prospective memory refers to memory for future intentions and is a critical predictor of functional capacity in late adulthood. For many other cognitive abilities, self- and informant-rated methods of assessment are routinely used to guide clinical decision-making. However, little is known about the validity (and consequently the clinical utility) of subjective reports of prospective memory difficulties. Objective:The aim of this study was to compare clinical [mild cognitive impairment (MCI), dementia] and nonclinical older adults (healthy controls) on self- and informant-rated versions of prospective and retrospective memory function, as well as objective measures of prospective memory. Critical here was not only the assessment of between-group differences, but also whether these different methods of assessing memory function would show appropriate convergent and discriminant validity.
|Journal citation||61 (3), pp. 251 - 257|
|Digital Object Identifier (DOI)||https://doi.org/10.1159/000371347|
|Page range||251 - 257|
|Research Group||School of Philosophy|
File Access Level
2views this month
0downloads this month