Testing the mettle of national human rights institutions: A case study of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia
Journal article
Renshaw, Catherine, Byrnes, Andrew and Durbach, Andrea. (2010). Testing the mettle of national human rights institutions: A case study of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia. Asian Journal of International Law. 1(1), pp. 165 - 198. https://doi.org/10.1017/S204425131000038X
Authors | Renshaw, Catherine, Byrnes, Andrew and Durbach, Andrea |
---|---|
Abstract | In April 2008, the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (SUHAKAM) was informed of the possible downgrading of its “A” status within the UN system, due to its apparent failure to comply with the Paris Principles relating to the status of national human rights institutions. This article explores this threat to downgrade SUHAKAM and the actions which it stimulated on the part of the Malaysian government and SUHAKAM itself. It argues that despite expectations by government and civil society at the time of its establishment, SUHAKAM has directly challenged government on major human rights issues on a number of occasions. At the same time, it has had difficulty persuading government to give effect to its recommendations and has as a consequence drawn strong criticism from civil society for failing to protect human rights that are within the government’s power to rectify. |
Year | 2010 |
Journal | Asian Journal of International Law |
Journal citation | 1 (1), pp. 165 - 198 |
Publisher | Cambridge University Press |
ISSN | 2044-2513 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1017/S204425131000038X |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-79954599657 |
Page range | 165 - 198 |
Research Group | Thomas More Law School |
Place of publication | United Kingdom |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8v2w5/testing-the-mettle-of-national-human-rights-institutions-a-case-study-of-the-human-rights-commission-of-malaysia
100
total views0
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month