Cross-sectional examination of musculoskeletal conditions and multimorbidity: Influence of different thresholds and definitions on prevalence and association estimates
Journal article
Lowe, Dianne B., Taylor, Michael J. and Hill, Sophie J.. (2017). Cross-sectional examination of musculoskeletal conditions and multimorbidity: Influence of different thresholds and definitions on prevalence and association estimates. BMC Research Notes. 10(1), pp. 1 - 13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2376-4
Authors | Lowe, Dianne B., Taylor, Michael J. and Hill, Sophie J. |
---|---|
Abstract | Background: Multimorbidity and musculoskeletal conditions create substantial burden for people and health systems. Quantifying the extent of co-occurring conditions is hampered by conceptual heterogeneity, imprecision and/or indecision about how multimorbidity is defined. The purpose of this study is to examine the influence of different ways of operationalising multimorbidity on multimorbidity prevalence rates with a focus on working-age adults with musculoskeletal conditions. Weighted population prevalence rates of multimorbidity among working-age Australians were estimated using data from the National Health Survey. Two nominal thresholds (2+ or 3+ co-occurring conditions) and three operational definitions of multimorbidity (survey-, policy- and research-based) were examined. Using logistic regression, we estimated the association between the prevalence of multimorbidity among persons with musculoskeletal conditions compared to persons with non-musculoskeletal conditions for each definition and threshold combination. Results: As few as 7.9% of working-age Australians have 2+ conditions using the research-based definition (95% CI 7.4–8.5%), compared to estimates of 15.3% (95% CI 14.3–16.2%) and 61.5% (95% CI 60.3–62.7%). with the policy- and survey-based definitions, respectively. Depending on definition, with the 3+ threshold multimorbidity prevalence ranged from 2.1% (research) to 41.9% (survey). Among the sub-sample with musculoskeletal conditions, multimorbidity with the 2+ threshold ranged from 20.2 to 92.2%; and with 3+ threshold from 5.9 to 75.4%, again lowest with the research-definition and highest with the survey-definition. When compared to any other condition (i.e. non-musculoskeletal conditions), all musculoskeletal conditions were positively associated with multimorbidity, regardless of definition or threshold. Conclusions: Depending on definition and threshold, multimorbidity is either rare or endemic in working-age Australians. Irrespective of definition, musculoskeletal conditions are a near-ubiquitous feature of multimorbidity. |
Keywords | multimorbidity; comorbidity; musculoskeletal conditions; prevalence |
Year | 2017 |
Journal | BMC Research Notes |
Journal citation | 10 (1), pp. 1 - 13 |
Publisher | BioMed Central |
ISSN | 1756-0500 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2376-4 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-85009895016 |
Open access | Open access |
Page range | 1 - 13 |
Research Group | School of Allied Health |
Publisher's version | License |
Place of publication | United Kingdom |
Editors | T. Hughes |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8v303/cross-sectional-examination-of-musculoskeletal-conditions-and-multimorbidity-influence-of-different-thresholds-and-definitions-on-prevalence-and-association-estimates
Download files
Publisher's version
75
total views93
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month