The nature of the atonement
Book chapter
Stump, Eleonore. (2012). The nature of the atonement. In In K. Clark and M. Rea (Ed.). Reason, Metaphysics, and Mind: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga pp. 128 - 144 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199766864.001.0001
Authors | Stump, Eleonore |
---|---|
Editors | K. Clark and M. Rea |
Abstract | The doctrine of the atonement differs from other major Christian doctrines, such as the doctrine of the incarnation, for example, in having no formula specifying its interpretation. For this reason, it is possible for there to be highly divergent interpretations, all of which count as orthodox. In this paper, by focusing on the nature of love, guilt, and shame, I highlight the problems for the two main kinds of interpretation into which varying orthodox accounts of the doctrine of the atonement fall. My purposes is to point out where we might profitably focus for further reflection on the doctrine. |
Page range | 128 - 144 |
Year | 2012 |
Book title | Reason, Metaphysics, and Mind: New Essays on the Philosophy of Alvin Plantinga |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Place of publication | United Kingdom |
ISBN | 9780199766864 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199766864.001.0001 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-84921633148 |
Publisher's version | File Access Level Controlled |
Permalink -
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8v37v/the-nature-of-the-atonement
Restricted files
Publisher's version
(1 files)
131
total views0
total downloads2
views this month0
downloads this month