Relationships between model-predicted and actual match-play exercise-intensity performance in professional Australian footballers during a preseason training macrocycle
Journal article
Graham, Stuart R., Cormack, Stuart, Parfitt, Gaynor and Eston, Roger. (2019). Relationships between model-predicted and actual match-play exercise-intensity performance in professional Australian footballers during a preseason training macrocycle. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance. 14(2), pp. 232-238. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0752
Authors | Graham, Stuart R., Cormack, Stuart, Parfitt, Gaynor and Eston, Roger |
---|---|
Abstract | Purpose: To assess and compare the validity of internal and external Australian football (AF) training-load measures for predicting preseason variation of match-play exercise intensity (MEI sim/min) using a variable dose–response model. Methods: A total of 21 professional male AF players completed an 18-wk preseason macrocycle. Preseason internal training load was quntified using the session rating-of-perceived-exertion method (sRPE) and external load from satellite (as distance [Dist] and high-speed distance [HS Dist]) and accelerometer (Player Load [PL]) data. Using a training-impulse (TRIMPs) calculation, external load expressed in arbitrary units was represented as TRIMPsDist, TRIMPsHSDist, and TRIMPsPL. Preseason training load and MEI sim/min data were applied to a variable dose–response model, which provided estimates of MEI sim/min. Model estimates of MEI sim/min were correlated with actual measures from each match-play drill performed during the preseason macrocycle. Magnitude-based inferences (effect size [90% confidence interval]) were calculated to determine practical differences in the precision of MEI sim/min estimates using each of the internal- and external-load inputs. Results: Estimates of MEI sim/min demonstrated very large and large associations with actual MEI sim/min with models constructed from external and internal training inputs (r [90% confidence interval]; TRIMPsDist .73 [.72–.74], TRIMPsPL .72 [.71–.73], and sRPESkills .67 [.56–.78]). There were trivial differences in the precision of MEI sim/min estimates between models constructed from TRIMPsDist and TRIMPsPL and between internal input methods. Conclusions: Variable dose-response models from multiple training-load inputs can predict the within-individual variation of MEI sim/min across an entire preseason macrocycle. Models informed by external training inputs (TRIMPsDist and TRIMPsPL) exhibited predictive power comparable to those of sRPESkills models. |
Keywords | internal training load; external training load; variable dose–response model |
Year | 2019 |
Journal | International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance |
Journal citation | 14 (2), pp. 232-238 |
Publisher | Human Kinetics, Inc. |
ISSN | 1555-0265 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2017-0752 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-85060620268 |
Open access | Published as green open access |
Page range | 232-238 |
Author's accepted manuscript | License All rights reserved File Access Level Open |
Publisher's version | License All rights reserved File Access Level Controlled |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
Online | 2019 |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 17 May 2021 |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8w12z/relationships-between-model-predicted-and-actual-match-play-exercise-intensity-performance-in-professional-australian-footballers-during-a-preseason-training-macrocycle
Download files
Author's accepted manuscript
AM_Graham_2019_Relationships_between_model_predicted_and_actual.pdf | |
License: All rights reserved | |
File access level: Open |
Restricted files
Publisher's version
88
total views47
total downloads1
views this month3
downloads this month