Illusory gender-equality paradox, math self-concept, and frame-of-reference Effect : New integrative explanations for multiple paradoxes
Journal article
Marsh, Herbert W., Parker, Philip D., Guo, Jiesi, Basarkod, Geetanjali, Niepel, Christoph and Van Zanden, Brooke. (2020). Illusory gender-equality paradox, math self-concept, and frame-of-reference Effect : New integrative explanations for multiple paradoxes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 121(1), pp. 168-183. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000306
Authors | Marsh, Herbert W., Parker, Philip D., Guo, Jiesi, Basarkod, Geetanjali, Niepel, Christoph and Van Zanden, Brooke |
---|---|
Abstract | Gender-equality paradoxes (GEPs) posit that gender gaps in math self-concepts (MSCs) are larger—not smaller—in countries with greater gender equality. These paradoxical results suggest that efforts to improve gender equality might be counterproductive. However, we show that this currently popular explanation of gender differences is an illusory, epi-phenomenon (485,490 students, 18,292 schools, 68 countries/regions). Between-country (absolute) measures of gender equality are confounded with achievement and socioeconomic-status; tiny GEPs disappear when controlling achievement and socioeconomic-status. Critically, even without controls GEPs are not supported when using true gender-gap measures—within-country (relative) female-male differences, that hold many confounds constant. This absolute/relative-gap distinction is more important than the composite/domain-specific distinction for understanding why even tiny GEPs are illusory. Recent developments in academic self-concept theory are relevant to GEPs and gender differences, but also explain other, related paradoxes. The big-fish little pond effect posits that attending schools with high school-average math achievements leads to lower MSCs. Extending this theoretical model to the country-level, we show that countries with high country-average math achievements also have lower MSCs. Dimensional comparison theory predicts that MSCs are positively predicted by math achievements but negatively predicted by verbal achievements. Extending this theoretical model, we show that girls’ low MSCs are due more to girls’ high verbal achievements that detract from their MSCs than to their low math achievements. In support of the pan-human wide generalizability of our findings, our cross-national results generalize over 68 country/regions as well as multiple math self-belief constructs (self-efficacy, anxiety, interest, utility, future plans) and multiple gender-equality measures. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved) |
Keywords | math self-beliefs; gender differences; gender-equality paradox; cross-national comparisons; social and dimensional comparison theories |
Year | 2020 |
Journal | Journal of Personality and Social Psychology |
Journal citation | 121 (1), pp. 168-183 |
Publisher | American Psychological Association |
ISSN | 0022-3514 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000306 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-85086672177 |
Open access | Published as green open access |
Research or scholarly | Research |
Page range | 168-183 |
Author's accepted manuscript | License All rights reserved File Access Level Open |
Publisher's version | License All rights reserved File Access Level Controlled |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
Online | 11 Jun 2020 |
Publication process dates | |
Accepted | 13 Apr 2020 |
Deposited | 06 Jul 2021 |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8w51x/illusory-gender-equality-paradox-math-self-concept-and-frame-of-reference-effect-new-integrative-explanations-for-multiple-paradoxes
Download files
Author's accepted manuscript
AM_Marsh_2020_Illusory_gender_equality_paradox_math_self.pdf | |
License: All rights reserved | |
File access level: Open |
Restricted files
Publisher's version
157
total views571
total downloads1
views this month11
downloads this month