Implementing caseload midwifery : Exploring the views of maternity managers in Australia - A national cross-sectional survey

Journal article


Dawson, Kate, McLachlan, Helen, Newton, Michelle and Forster, Della. (2016). Implementing caseload midwifery : Exploring the views of maternity managers in Australia - A national cross-sectional survey. Australian Midwifery. 29(3), pp. 214-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.10.010
AuthorsDawson, Kate, McLachlan, Helen, Newton, Michelle and Forster, Della
Abstract

Background
The benefits of caseload midwifery care are clearly documented, and many policy documents in Australia support its expansion. Despite this, little is known about the availability of caseload across Australia, nor about what proportion of women have access to a caseload model. This paper describes caseload midwifery in the public maternity system in Australia; its prevalence, and factors associated with implementation and sustainability.

Methods
A cross-sectional online survey of maternity managers of public hospitals that provide birthing services throughout Australia.

Findings
Sixty-three percent (149/235) of eligible participants responded. Respondents were from all states and territories, metropolitan, regional and remote areas, and from hospitals with very small to very large birth numbers. Only 31% reported that their hospital offers caseload midwifery, and an estimated eight percent of women received caseload care at the time of the survey, most of whom were considered to be of ‘low obstetric risk’. Many respondents were planning to implement or expand caseload. Key factors associated with the implementation of caseload were funding to establish the model, the interest and availability of staff to work in the model, organisational support and perceived consumer demand.

Conclusion
This is the first study to explore caseload implementation at a national level. Although the number of services offering caseload midwifery care has increased nationally, access remains relatively limited. Women who live in metropolitan areas and who are considered at ‘low obstetric risk’ are most likely to be able to access this model. Funding and support for establishing new models are the main barriers to implementation.

Keywordscaseload midwifery; sustainability; maternity workforce; continuity of care model; Australian maternity service
Year2016
JournalAustralian Midwifery
Journal citation29 (3), pp. 214-222
PublisherElsevier BV
ISSN1871-5192
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2015.10.010
Scopus EID2-s2.0-84947572755
Research or scholarlyResearch
Page range214-222
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online19 Nov 2015
Publication process dates
Accepted22 Oct 2015
Deposited16 Jul 2021
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8w629/implementing-caseload-midwifery-exploring-the-views-of-maternity-managers-in-australia-a-national-cross-sectional-survey

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 3
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Midwives’ views of caseload midwifery – comparing the caseload and non-caseload midwives’ opinions. A cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives
Newton, Michelle, Dawson, Kate, Forster, Della and McLachlan, Helen. (2021). Midwives’ views of caseload midwifery – comparing the caseload and non-caseload midwives’ opinions. A cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives. Women and Birth. 34(1), pp. e47-e56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2020.06.006
Operationalising caseload midwifery in the Australian public maternity system : Findings from a national cross-sectional survey of maternity managers
Dawson, Kate, Forster, Della A., McLachlan, Helen L. and Newton, Michelle S.. (2018). Operationalising caseload midwifery in the Australian public maternity system : Findings from a national cross-sectional survey of maternity managers. Australian Midwifery. 31(3), pp. 194-201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2017.08.132
Comparing caseload and non-caseload midwives’ burnout levels and professional attitudes : A national, cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives working in the public maternity system
Dawson, Kate, Newton, Michelle, Forster, Della and McLachlan, Helen. (2018). Comparing caseload and non-caseload midwives’ burnout levels and professional attitudes : A national, cross-sectional survey of Australian midwives working in the public maternity system. Midwifery. 63, pp. 60-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.04.026
Nutrition and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia: systematic review
Beaudart, Charlotte, Dawson, A., Shaw, S. C., Harvey, Nicholas C., Kanis, John, Binkley, Neil, Reginster, Jean Yves, Chapurlat, R., Chan, D. C., Bruyère, O., Rizzoli, Rene, Cooper, Cyrus and Dennison, Elaine M.. (2017). Nutrition and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of sarcopenia: systematic review. Osteoporosis International. 28(6), pp. 1817 - 1833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3980-9
Exploring midwifery students' views and experiences of caseload midwifery : A cross-sectional survey conducted in Victoria, Australia
Dawson, Kate, Newton, Michelle, Forster, Della and McLachlan, Helen. (2015). Exploring midwifery students' views and experiences of caseload midwifery : A cross-sectional survey conducted in Victoria, Australia. Midwifery. 31(2), pp. e7-e15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2014.09.007