Response to Denys Turner

Journal article


Coakley, Sarah. (2020). Response to Denys Turner. Modern Theology. 36(1), pp. 155-158. https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12572
AuthorsCoakley, Sarah
Abstract

[Extract] First, let me thank Denys Turner for a characteristically stimulating and thought-provoking article, which has taught me much, especially about the crucial differences in two distinct theories of atheism in Marx’s thought. In responding to Turner I would like to take up just three major points from his article; and as well as commenting on what he writes here, I shall attempt to push the themes he raises a bit further in order to link them to the core concerns of this symposium and to potential contact with other articles.

Year2020
JournalModern Theology
Journal citation36 (1), pp. 155-158
PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
ISSN0266-7177
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/moth.12572
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85076203637
Research or scholarlyResearch
Page range155-158
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online05 Dec 2019
Publication process dates
Deposited06 Sep 2021
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8wv85/response-to-denys-turner

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 75
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

The Problem of Paradox in Analytic Christology : Some After-Dinner Reflections
Coakley, Sarah Anne. (2024). The Problem of Paradox in Analytic Christology : Some After-Dinner Reflections. In Paradox and Contradiction in Theology pp. 9-16 Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003319221-2
Beyond understanding
Coakley, Sarah. (2021). Beyond understanding. Political Theology. 22(5), pp. 398-406. https://doi.org/10.1080/1462317X.2021.1955575
Concluding eirenic (and mostly “unscientific”) postscript
Coakley, Sarah. (2019). Concluding eirenic (and mostly “unscientific”) postscript. Religion, Brain and Behavior. 9(4), pp. 423-434. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2019.1604419
Response to my critics in the journal of pentecostal theology
Coakley, Sarah. (2017). Response to my critics in the journal of pentecostal theology. Journal of Pentecostal Theology. 26(1), pp. 23-29. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455251-02601004
Person of Christ
Coakley, Sarah Anne. (2016). Person of Christ. In The Cambridge Companion to the Summa Theologiae pp. 222-239 Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139034159.018
Divine hiddenness or dark intimacy? How John of the Cross dissolves a contemporary philosophical dilemma
Coakley, Sarah Anne. (2016). Divine hiddenness or dark intimacy? How John of the Cross dissolves a contemporary philosophical dilemma. In Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives pp. 229-245 Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139939621.014
Religious motivations for cooperation : An experimental investigation using explicit primes
Rand, David G., Dreber, Anna, Haque, Omar S., Kane, Rob J., Nowak, Martin A. and Coakley, Sarah. (2014). Religious motivations for cooperation : An experimental investigation using explicit primes. Religion, Brain and Behavior. 4(1), pp. 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2013.775664