Indexicals, context-sensitivity and the failure of implication

Journal article

Russell, Gillian. (2011). Indexicals, context-sensitivity and the failure of implication. Synthese. 183(2), pp. 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9756-9
AuthorsRussell, Gillian
Abstract

This paper investigates, formulates and proves an indexical barrier theorem, according to which sets of non-indexical sentences do not entail (except under specified special circumstances) indexical sentences. It surveys the usual difficulties for this kind of project, as well some that are specific to the case of indexicals, and adapts the strategy of Restall and Russell’s “Barriers to Implication” to overcome these. At the end of the paper a reverse barrier theorem is also proved, according to which an indexical sentence will not, except under specified circumstances, entail a non-indexical one.

Keywordsindexical; context-sensitive; language; logic; implication barrier theorem
Year2011
JournalSynthese
Journal citation183 (2), pp. 143-160
PublisherSpringer
ISSN0039-7857
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-010-9756-9
Scopus EID2-s2.0-80053921007
Research or scholarlyResearch
Page range143-160
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online24 Jun 2010
Publication process dates
Accepted03 Jun 2010
Deposited25 Oct 2021
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8wxq2/indexicals-context-sensitivity-and-the-failure-of-implication

Log in to edit

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 70
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

From Anti-Exceptionalism to Feminist Logic
Russell, Gillian Kay. (2024). From Anti-Exceptionalism to Feminist Logic. Hypatia: a journal of feminist philosophy. 39(1), pp. 79-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/hyp.2023.125
How the laws of logic lie
Russell, Gillian K.. (2023). How the laws of logic lie. Episteme. 20(4), pp. 833-851. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2024.4
How to prove Hume’s Law
Russell, Gillian. (2022). How to prove Hume’s Law. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 51, pp. 603-632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-021-09643-3
Fancy loose talk about knowledge
Russell, Gillian Kay. (2022). Fancy loose talk about knowledge. Inquiry. 65(7), pp. 789-820. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2021.1990791
Logic : A feminist approach
Russell, Gillian. (2020). Logic : A feminist approach. In In Garchar, Kimberly K. and Shew, Melissa M. (Ed.). Philosophy for girls : An invitation to a life of thought pp. 79-98 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190072919.003.0007
Logic isn't normative
Russell, Gillian. (2020). Logic isn't normative. Inquiry. 63(3-4), pp. 371 - 388. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1372305
Logical pluralism
Russell, Gillian. (2019). Logical pluralism. In In Zalta, Edward N. (Ed.). Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy pp. 1-16 Stanford University Press.
Varieties of logical consequence by their resistance to logical nihilism
Russell, Gillian. (2019). Varieties of logical consequence by their resistance to logical nihilism. In In Wyatt, Jeremy, Pedersen, Nikolaj J. L. L. and Kellen, Nathan (Ed.). Pluralisms in truth and logic pp. 331-361 Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98346-2_14
Subordinating speech and speaking up
Russell, Gillian. (2019). Subordinating speech and speaking up. In In E. Lepore and D. Sosa (Ed.). Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Language; Volume 1 pp. 178 - 207 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198836568.001.0001
Deviance and vice: Strength as a theoretical virtue in the epistemology of logic
Russell, Gillian. (2019). Deviance and vice: Strength as a theoretical virtue in the epistemology of logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 99(3), pp. 548 - 563. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12498
Breaking the spell: Waismann's papers on the analytic/synthetic distinction
Russell, Gillian. (2019). Breaking the spell: Waismann's papers on the analytic/synthetic distinction. In In D. Makovec and S. Shapiro (Ed.). Friedrich Waismann: The Open Texture of Analytic Philosophy pp. 159 - 187 Palgrave Macmillan Ltd.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-25008-9_8
Logical pluralism without the normativity
Blake-Turner, Christopher and Russell, Gillian. (2018). Logical pluralism without the normativity. Synthese. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01939-3
Logical nihilism: Could there be no logic
Russell, Gillian K.. (2018). Logical nihilism: Could there be no logic. Philosophical issues. 28(1), pp. 308 - 324. https://doi.org/10.1111/phis.12127
Indexicals and Sider’s Neo-linguistic Account of Necessity
Russell, Gillian. (2017). Indexicals and Sider’s Neo-linguistic Account of Necessity. Res Philosophica. 94(3), pp. 385 - 397. https://doi.org/10.11612/resphil.1576
The justification of the basic laws of logic
Russell, Gillian. (2015). The justification of the basic laws of logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 44(6), pp. 793 - 803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-015-9360-z
Practicing Evil : training and psychological barriers in the martial arts
Russell, Gillian Kay. (2014). Practicing Evil : training and psychological barriers in the martial arts. In Philosophy and the Martial Arts pp. 28-49 Routledge.
Quine on the Analytic / Synthetic Distinction
Russell, Gillian Kay. (2014). Quine on the Analytic / Synthetic Distinction. In A Companion to W. V. O. Quine pp. 181-202 Blackwell Publishers Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118607992.ch9
Metaphysical analyticity and the epistemology of logic
Russell, Gillian K.. (2014). Metaphysical analyticity and the epistemology of logic. Philosophical Studies. 171(1), pp. 161 - 175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0255-y
Hybrid identities and just being yourself
Russell, Gillian. (2014). Hybrid identities and just being yourself. Inquiry. 57(4), pp. 455 - 465. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2014.905267
Necessity and meaning
Russell, Gillian. (2012). Necessity and meaning. In In Russell, Gillian and Graff Fara, Delia (Ed.). Routledge companion to philosophy of language pp. 782-794 Routledge.
Lessons from the Logic of Demonstratives : What indexicality teaches us about logic, and vice versa
Russell, Gillian. (2012). Lessons from the Logic of Demonstratives : What indexicality teaches us about logic, and vice versa. In In Restall, Greg and Russell, Gillian (Ed.). New waves in philosophical logic pp. 190-216 Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137003720_11
Development of a standardised Occupational Therapy - Driver Off-Road Assessment Battery to assess older and/or functionally impaired drivers
Unsworth, Carolyn, Baker, Anne, Taitz, Carla, Chan, Siew-Pang, Pallant, Julie, Russell, Kay and Odell, Morris. (2012). Development of a standardised Occupational Therapy - Driver Off-Road Assessment Battery to assess older and/or functionally impaired drivers. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal. 59(1), pp. 23 - 36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-1630.2011.00979.x
A new problem for the linguistic doctrine of necessary truth
Russell, Gillian. (2010). A new problem for the linguistic doctrine of necessary truth. In In Wright, Cory D. and Pedersen, Nikolaj J. L. L. (Ed.). New waves in truth pp. 267-281 Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230296992_18
Epistemic viciousness in the martial arts
Russell, Gillian. (2010). Epistemic viciousness in the martial arts. In In Priest, Graham and Young, Damon (Ed.). Martial arts and philosophy : Beating and nothingness pp. 129-144 Open Court Publishing Company.
Analyticity in externalist languages
Russell, Gillian. (2010). Analyticity in externalist languages. In In Sawyer, Sarah (Ed.). New waves in philosophy of language pp. 186-205 Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230248588_10
One true logic?
Russell, Gillian. (2008). One true logic? Journal of Philosophical Logic. 37, pp. 593-611. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-008-9082-6
Knowledge by indifference
Russell, Gillian K. and Doris, John M.. (2008). Knowledge by indifference. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 86(3), pp. 429-437. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048400802001996
The analytic/synthetic distinction
Russell, Gillian. (2007). The analytic/synthetic distinction. Philosophy Compass. 2(5), pp. 712-729. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00093.x