Knowledge, practical adequacy and stakes

Book chapter

Anderson, Charity and Hawthorne, John. (2019). Knowledge, practical adequacy and stakes. In In Gendler, Tamar Szabó and Hawthorne, John (Ed.). Oxford studies in epistemology, Volume 6 pp. 234-257 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833314.003.0010
AuthorsAnderson, Charity and Hawthorne, John
EditorsGendler, Tamar Szabó and Hawthorne, John
Abstract

Defenses of pragmatic encroachment commonly rely on two thoughts: first, that the gap between one’s strength of epistemic position on p and perfect strength sometimes makes a difference to what one is justified in doing, and second, that the higher the stakes, the harder it is to know. It is often assumed that these ideas complement each other. This chapter shows that these ideas are far from complementary. Along the way, a variety of strategies for regimenting the somewhat inchoate notion of stakes are indicated, and some troubling cases for pragmatic encroachment raised.

Keywordsknowledge; action; stake; pragmatic encroachment
Page range234-257
Year2019
Book titleOxford studies in epistemology, Volume 6
PublisherOxford University Press
Place of publicationUnited States
ISBN9780198833314
9780192569769
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198833314.003.0010
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online24 Mar 2019
Publication process dates
Deposited15 Nov 2021
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8x0y2/knowledge-practical-adequacy-and-stakes

Log in to edit

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 66
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Counterpart theory and counterfactuals
Hawthorne, John and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2023). Counterpart theory and counterfactuals. In In Bennett, Karen and Zimmerman, Dean W. (Ed.). Oxford studies in metaphysics ; volume 13 pp. 129-165 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192886033.003.0005
Inheritance : Professor Procrastinate and the logic
Blumberg, Kyle and Hawthorne, John. (2023). Inheritance : Professor Procrastinate and the logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 106(1), pp. 84-106. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12846
Intensionalism and propositional attitudes
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2022). Intensionalism and propositional attitudes. In In Kriegel, Uriah (Ed.). Oxford studies in philosophy of mind ; volume 2 pp. 114-174 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192856685.003.0005
Non-measurability, imprecise credences, and imprecise chances
Isaacs, Yoaav, Hájek, Alan and Hawthorne, John. (2022). Non-measurability, imprecise credences, and imprecise chances. Mind. 131(523), pp. 894-918. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzab031
Reply to Bourget and Mendelovici
Yli-Vakkuri, Tuomo Juhani and Hawthorne, John Patrick. (2022). Reply to Bourget and Mendelovici. Inquiry. pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2129485
Desire
Blumberg, Kyle and Hawthorne, John. (2022). Desire. Philosophers' Imprint. 22(8), pp. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3998/phimp.2116
A new hope
Blumberg, Kyle and Hawthorne, John. (2022). A new hope. Journal of Philosophy. 119(1), pp. 5-32. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil202211911
Being in a position to know
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2022). Being in a position to know. Philosophical Studies. 179, pp. 1323-1339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01709-x
Knowledge from multiple experiences
Goldstein, Simon and Hawthorne, John. (2022). Knowledge from multiple experiences. Philosophical Studies. 179(4), pp. 1341-1372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01710-4
Counterfactual contamination
Goldstein, Simon and Hawthorne, John. (2022). Counterfactual contamination. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 100(2), pp. 262-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2021.1886129
The epistemic use of ‘ought’
Hawthorne, John Patrick. (2021). The epistemic use of ‘ought’. In Conditionals, Probability & Paradox: Themes from the Philosophy of Dorothy Edgington pp. 164-173 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198712732.003.0010
Solving a paradox of evidential equivalence
Dorr, Cian, Hawthorne, John and Isaacs, Yoaav. (2021). Solving a paradox of evidential equivalence. Mind. 130(520), pp. 1159-1182. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/fzaa022
The rationality of epistemic akrasia
Hawthorne, John, Isaacs, Yoaav and Lasonen-Aarnio, Maria. (2021). The rationality of epistemic akrasia. Philosophical Perspectives. 35(1), pp. 206-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12144
Wanting what’s not best
Blumberg, Kyle and Hawthorne, John. (2021). Wanting what’s not best. Philosophical Studies. 179(4), pp. 1275-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-021-01707-z
The bounds of possibility : Puzzles of modal variation
Dorr, Cian, Hawthorne, John and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2021). The bounds of possibility : Puzzles of modal variation Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192846655.001.0001
Scotus on universals
Hawthorne, John. (2021). Scotus on universals. In In Pasnau, Robert (Ed.). Oxford studies in medieval philosophy : Volume 4 pp. 64-77 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198786368.003.0003
Reply to Speaks
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2021). Reply to Speaks. Philosophical Studies. 178(9), pp. 3061-3065. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01553-5
Reply to Pietroski
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2021). Reply to Pietroski. Philosophical Studies. 178(9), pp. 3055-3059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01552-6
Reply to Byrne
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2021). Reply to Byrne. Philosophical Studies. 178(9), pp. 3049-3054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01551-7
Graded epistemic justification
Hawthorne, John and Logins, Artūrs. (2020). Graded epistemic justification. Philosophical Studies. 178(6), pp. 1845-1858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-020-01512-0
Indexicality, de re belief, and narrow content : A reply to Sawyer
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2020). Indexicality, de re belief, and narrow content : A reply to Sawyer. Inquiry. pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2020.1831852
The necessity of mathematics
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2020). The necessity of mathematics. Noûs. 54(3), pp. 549 - 577. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12268
Pragmatic Encroachment and Closure
Anderson, Charity and Hawthorne, John. (2019). Pragmatic Encroachment and Closure. In In B. Kim and M. McGrath (Ed.). Pragmatic Encroachment in Epistemology pp. 107 - 115 Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315168197
Operator arguments revisited
Fritz, Peter, Hawthorne, John and Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani. (2019). Operator arguments revisited. Philosophical Studies. 176(11), pp. 2933 - 2959. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-018-1158-8
Possible Patterns
Russell, Jeffrey Sanford and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Possible Patterns. In In K. Bennett and D. W. Zimmerman (Ed.). Oxford Studies in Metaphysics pp. 149 - 193 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198828198.003.0005
Narrow content
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Narrow content Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.001.0001
Reflections on the Ideology of Reasons
Hawthorne, John and Magidor, Ofra. (2018). Reflections on the Ideology of Reasons. In In D. Star (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Reasons and Normativity pp. 113 - 142 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199657889.013.6
Fine-tuning Fine-tuning
Hawthorne, John and Isaacs, Yoaav. (2018). Fine-tuning Fine-tuning. In In M. A. Bentone, J. Hawthorne and D. Rabinowitz (Ed.). Knowledge, Belief, and God: New Insights in Religious Epistemology pp. 136 - 168 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198798705.003.0008
Narrow content and ur-content
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Narrow content and ur-content. In Narrow Content pp. 72 - 105 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0004
Quasi-internalism
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Quasi-internalism. In Narrow Content pp. 158 - 175 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0006
Rationality and narrow content
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Rationality and narrow content. In Narrow Content pp. 130 - 157 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0005
Truth-conditionality
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). Truth-conditionality. In Narrow Content pp. 63 - 97 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0003
What is narrow content?
Yli-Vakkuri, Juhani and Hawthorne, John. (2018). What is narrow content? In Narrow Content pp. 1 - 46 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785965.003.0002
Knowledge and false belief
Hawthorne, John. (2017). Knowledge and false belief. In In Borges, Rodrigo, de Almeida, Claudio and Klein, Peter D. (Ed.). Explaining knowledge : New essays on the gettier problem pp. 325-344 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198724551.003.0020
Misapprehensions about the fine-tuning argument
Hawthorne, John and Isaacs, Yoaav. (2017). Misapprehensions about the fine-tuning argument. Religious Epistemology. 81, pp. 133 - 155. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246117000297
Evil and evidence
Benton, Matthew A., Hawthorne, John and Isaacs, Yoaav. (2016). Evil and evidence. In In Kvanvig, Jonathan (Ed.). Oxford studies in philosophy of religion : Volume 7 pp. 1-31 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198757702.003.0001
Higher-order free logic and the prior-Kaplan paradox
Bacon, Andrew, Hawthorne, John and Uzquiano, Gabriel. (2016). Higher-order free logic and the prior-Kaplan paradox. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 46(4-5), pp. 493 - 541. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1201387
Belief is weak
Hawthorne, John, Rothschild, Daniel and Spectre, Levi. (2016). Belief is weak. Philosophical Studies. 173(5), pp. 1393 - 1404. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-015-0553-7
General dynamic trivality theorems
Russell, Jeffrey Sanford and Hawthorne, John. (2016). General dynamic trivality theorems. The Philosophical Review. 125(3), pp. 307 - 339. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-3516936
Higher-order free logic and the Prior-Kaplan paradox
Bacon, Andrew, Hawthorne, John and Uzquiano, Gabriel. (2016). Higher-order free logic and the Prior-Kaplan paradox. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 46(4-5), pp. 493 - 541. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2016.1201387
Some remarks on imagination and convention
Hawthorne, John. (2016). Some remarks on imagination and convention. Mind and Language. 31(5), pp. 625 - 634. https://doi.org/10.1111/mila.12123
Comments on transient truths: An essay in the metaphysics of propositions (Berit Brogaard)
Hawthorne, John. (2015). Comments on transient truths: An essay in the metaphysics of propositions (Berit Brogaard). Inquiry. 58(6), pp. 617 - 624. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2015.1077014
Cretan deductions
Fraser, Rachel Elizabeth and Hawthorne, John. (2015). Cretan deductions. Philosophical Perspectives. 29(1), pp. 163 - 178. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12070
Groupthink
Russell, Jeffrey Sanford, Hawthorne, John and Buchak, Lara. (2015). Groupthink. Philosophical Studies. 172(5), pp. 1287 - 1309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0350-8
Semantic plasticity and speech reports
Dorr, Cian and Hawthorne, John. (2014). Semantic plasticity and speech reports. The Philosophical Review. 123(3), pp. 281 - 338. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2683531
Semantic plasticity and speech reports
Dorr, Cian and Hawthorne, John. (2014). Semantic plasticity and speech reports. The Philosophical Review. 123(3), pp. 281 - 338. https://doi.org/10.1215/00318108-2683531
Knowing against the odds
Dorr, Cian, Goodman, Jeremy and Hawthorne, John. (2014). Knowing against the odds. Philosophical Studies. 170(2), pp. 277 - 287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-013-0212-9