Interrupting prolonged sitting with regular activity breaks does not acutely influence appetite : A Randomised controlled trial
Journal article
Mete, Evelyn M., Perry, Tracy L., Haszard, Jillian J., Homer, Ashleigh R., Fenemor, Stephen P., Rehrer, Nancy J., Skeaff, C. Murray and Peddie, Meredith C.. (2018). Interrupting prolonged sitting with regular activity breaks does not acutely influence appetite : A Randomised controlled trial. Nutrients. 10(2), p. Article 125. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10020125
Authors | Mete, Evelyn M., Perry, Tracy L., Haszard, Jillian J., Homer, Ashleigh R., Fenemor, Stephen P., Rehrer, Nancy J., Skeaff, C. Murray and Peddie, Meredith C. |
---|---|
Abstract | Regular activity breaks increase energy expenditure; however, this may promote compensatory eating behaviour. The present study compared the effects of regular activity breaks and prolonged sitting on appetite. In a randomised, cross-over trial, 36 healthy adults (BMI (Body Mass Index) 23.9 kg/m2 (S.D. = 3.9)) completed four, two-day interventions: two with prolonged sitting (SIT), and two with sitting and 2 min of walking every 30 min (RAB). Standardized meals were provided throughout the intervention, with an ad libitum meal at the end of Day 2. Appetite and satiety were assessed throughout both days of each intervention using five visual analogue scales. The five responses were combined into a single appetite response at each time point. The area under the appetite response curve (AUC) was calculated for each day. Intervention effects for appetite response AUC and ad libitum meal intake were tested using linear mixed models. Appetite AUC did not differ between interventions (standardised effect of RAB compared to SIT: Day 1: 0.11; 95% CI: −0.28, 0.06; p = 0.212; Day 2: 0.04; 95% CI: −0.15, 0.24; p = 0.648). There was no significant difference in energy consumed at the ad libitum lunch meal on Day 2 between RAB and SIT. Interrupting prolonged sitting with regular activity breaks does not acutely influence appetite or volume of food consumed, despite inferred increases in energy expenditure. Longer-term investigation into the effects of regular activity breaks on energy balance is warranted. |
Keywords | regular activity breaks; sedentary; appetite; randomized controlled trial |
Year | 2018 |
Journal | Nutrients |
Journal citation | 10 (2), p. Article 125 |
Publisher | Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI AG) |
ISSN | 2072-6643 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.3390/nu10020125 |
PubMed ID | 29373503 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-85041038359 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC5852701 |
Open access | Published as ‘gold’ (paid) open access |
Page range | 1-11 |
Funder | National Heart Foundation of New Zealand |
Lotteries Health Research | |
University of Otago | |
Publisher's version | License File Access Level Open |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
Online | 26 Jan 2018 |
Publication process dates | |
Accepted | 23 Jan 2018 |
Deposited | 18 Jan 2023 |
Grant ID | 1527 |
326803 | |
1518 |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8y9vv/interrupting-prolonged-sitting-with-regular-activity-breaks-does-not-acutely-influence-appetite-a-randomised-controlled-trial
Download files
Publisher's version
OA_Mete_2018_Interrupting_prolonged_sitting_with_regular_activity.pdf | |
License: CC BY 4.0 | |
File access level: Open |
31
total views27
total downloads0
views this month1
downloads this month