Predictors of herpes zoster vaccination among Australian adults aged 65 and over

Journal article


Ricks, Thomas, Trent, Mallory J. and MacIntyre, C. Raina. (2022). Predictors of herpes zoster vaccination among Australian adults aged 65 and over. Vaccine. 40(50), pp. 7182-7186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.064
AuthorsRicks, Thomas, Trent, Mallory J. and MacIntyre, C. Raina
Abstract

Objective(s)
To estimate HZ vaccine coverage in Australia among older Australians and to identify potential barriers to vaccination.

Design
Analysis of data from three cross-sectional surveys administered online between 2019 and 2020.

Setting and participants
Adults aged 65 and over residing in Australia.

Main outcome measures
Self-reported herpes zoster vaccination.

Results
Among the 744 adults aged 65 and over in this sample, 32% reported being vaccinated for HZ, including 23% of participants aged 65–74, 55% of participants aged 75–84, and 0% for participants aged 85 and above. Those who are vaccinated with other immunisations are more likely to have received HZ vaccine, including seasonal influenza (OR = 4.41, 95 % CI: 2.44–7.98) and pneumococcal vaccines (OR = 4.43, 95 % CI: 2.92 – 6.75). Participants with a history of certain conditions, such as stroke (OR = 2.26, 95 % CI: 1.13–4.49), were more likely to be vaccinated against HZ. Participants that reported smoking tobacco daily were less likely to be vaccinated against HZ (OR = 0.48, 95 % CI: 0.26–0.89). Participants were less likely to be vaccinated against HZ if they preferred to develop immunity ‘naturally’ (OR = 0.29, 95 % CI: 0.15 – 0.57) or expressed distrust of vaccines (OR = 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.13–0.91).

Conclusion(s)
Further research is required to understand the barriers to HZ vaccine uptake. Increasing the funding eligibility for those who are at risk of complications from shingles, or lowering the age of eligibility, may increase vaccine coverage.

KeywordsAustralia; coverage; herpes zoster; vaccine; shingles
Year2022
JournalVaccine
Journal citation40 (50), pp. 7182-7186
PublisherElsevier Ltd
ISSN0264-410X
1873-2518
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.10.064
PubMed ID36336528
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85142261711
Open accessPublished as green open access
Page range7182-7186
FunderNational Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)
Author's accepted manuscript
License
File Access Level
Open
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online03 Nov 2022
Publication process dates
Accepted24 Oct 2022
Deposited18 Aug 2023
Grant ID1107393
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8yw6z/predictors-of-herpes-zoster-vaccination-among-australian-adults-aged-65-and-over

Download files


Author's accepted manuscript
AM_Ricks_2022_Predictors_of_herpes_zoster_vaccination_among.pdf
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File access level: Open

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 41
    total views
  • 31
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

What are the facilitators and barriers experienced by sessional academics during the process of onboarding : A scoping review
Brouwer, Hendrika Jacoba, Griffiths, Semra, Jacob, Alycia, Ricks, Thomas Aaron, Schulz, Paula, Lavell, Sharni, Lam, Louisa and Jacob, Elisabeth. (2024). What are the facilitators and barriers experienced by sessional academics during the process of onboarding : A scoping review. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2024.2340987
What are the facilitators and barriers experienced by sessional academics during the process of onboarding: a scoping review
Brouwer, H., Griffiths, S., Jacob, A., Ricks, T., Schulz, P., Lam, L. and Jacob, E.. (2024). What are the facilitators and barriers experienced by sessional academics during the process of onboarding: a scoping review. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management. pp. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2024.2340987