Some question-begging objections to rule consequentialism

Journal article

Perl, Caleb. (2022). Some question-begging objections to rule consequentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2022.2056213
AuthorsPerl, Caleb
Abstract

This paper defends views like rule consequentialism by distinguishing between two sorts of ideal world objections. It aims to show that one of those sorts of objections is question-begging. Its success would open up a path forward for such views.

Keywordsrule consequentialism; ideal world; contractualism; cluelessness
Year2022
JournalAustralasian Journal of Philosophy
Journal citationpp. 1-16
PublisherRoutledge
ISSN0004-8402
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2022.2056213
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85136867858
Web address (URL)https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00048402.2022.2056213
Open accessPublished as green open access
Research or scholarlyResearch
Page range1-16
Author's accepted manuscript
License
File Access Level
Open
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online29 Aug 2022
Publication process dates
Accepted02 Mar 2022
Deposited18 May 2023
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8z093/some-question-begging-objections-to-rule-consequentialism

Log in to edit

Download files

Author's accepted manuscript
AM_Perl_2022_Some_question_begging_objections_to_rule.pdf
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File access level: Open

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 67
    total views
  • 51
    total downloads
  • 3
    views this month
  • 1
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Practical Political Liberalism
Perl, Caleb Herman. (2023). Practical Political Liberalism. In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy: Volume 9 pp. 65-97 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198877639.003.0003
Formulating moral error theory
Perl, Caleb Herman. (2022). Formulating moral error theory. The Journal of Philosophy. 119(5), pp. 279-288. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2022119518
An Epistemology for Moral Naturalists
Perl, Caleb Herman. (2022). An Epistemology for Moral Naturalists. In Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 17 pp. 166-196 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865601.003.0007
Solving the ideal worlds problem
Perl, Caleb Herman. (2021). Solving the ideal worlds problem. Ethics. 132(1), pp. 89-126. https://doi.org/10.1086/715289
Might moral epistemologists be asking the wrong questions?
Perl, Caleb. (2020). Might moral epistemologists be asking the wrong questions? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 100(3), pp. 556-585. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12564
A user’s guide to hybrid tools
Perl, Caleb. (2020). A user’s guide to hybrid tools. Mind. 129(513), pp. 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/MIND/FZY063
Presuppositions, attitudes, and why they matter
Perl, Caleb. (2020). Presuppositions, attitudes, and why they matter. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 98(2), pp. 363-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2019.1621911
Might moral epistemologists be asking the wrong questions?
Perl, Caleb. (2020). Might moral epistemologists be asking the wrong questions? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 100(3), pp. 556-585. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12564
A user’s guide to hybrid tools
Perl, Caleb. (2020). A user’s guide to hybrid tools. Mind: A Quarterly review of philosophy. 129(153), pp. 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/MIND/FZY063
Empirical ignorance as defeating moral intuitions? A puzzle for rule consequentialists (and others)
Perl, Caleb. (2019). Empirical ignorance as defeating moral intuitions? A puzzle for rule consequentialists (and others). Analysis. 79(1), pp. 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/any003
Empirical ignorance as defeating moral intuitions? A puzzle for rule consequentialists (and others)
Perl, Caleb. (2019). Empirical ignorance as defeating moral intuitions? A puzzle for rule consequentialists (and others). Analysis. 79(1), pp. 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/any003
Attributing error without taking a stand
Perl, Caleb and Schroeder, Mark. (2019). Attributing error without taking a stand. Philosophical Studies. 176(6), pp. 1453-1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01248-6
Shifty contextualism about epistemics
Perl, Caleb. (2017). Shifty contextualism about epistemics. Ergo. 4(28), pp. 783-820. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.028
An argument for temporalism and contingentism
Perl, Caleb. (2015). An argument for temporalism and contingentism. Philosophical Studies. 172(5), pp. 1387-1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0355-3