Protection from institutional censorship : An essential aspect of academic freedom

Journal article

Swannie, Bill. (2022). Protection from institutional censorship : An essential aspect of academic freedom. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 45(4), pp. 1489-1512. https://doi.org/10.53637/DHIC5747
AuthorsSwannie, Bill
Abstract

Traditional conceptions of academic freedom emphasise the importance of universities being free from external regulation or interference, to enable them to produce and disseminate expert knowledge through teaching, research, and scholarship. However, recent Australian court decisions and scholarship highlight the importance of protecting academic staff from disciplinary action by a university as an employer. Universities themselves may threaten academic freedom by punishing scholars for public comments within their areas of expertise. As academic freedom exists for the public benefit, rather than the benefit of universities or individual academics, legislation is needed to prevent universities from censoring scholars regarding public comment on matters within their expertise.

Year2022
JournalUniversity of New South Wales Law Journal
Journal citation45 (4), pp. 1489-1512
PublisherFaculty of Law, University of New South Wales
ISSN0313-0096
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.53637/DHIC5747
Page range1489-1512
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online2022
Publication process dates
Deposited29 May 2023
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8z122/protection-from-institutional-censorship-an-essential-aspect-of-academic-freedom

Log in to edit

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 49
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Examining BA v The King : Can a ‘home’ provide security from domestic violence?
Swannie, William. (2024). Examining BA v The King : Can a ‘home’ provide security from domestic violence? Alternative Law Journal. 49(2), pp. 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X241237015
A critical appraisal of the 'no contact' rule
Swannie, Bill. (2023). A critical appraisal of the 'no contact' rule. Adelaide Law Review. 44(1), pp. 246-273.
Protection from forced eviction : What rights do social housing tenants have under human rights charters?
Swannie, Bill. (2023). Protection from forced eviction : What rights do social housing tenants have under human rights charters? Australian Journal of Human Rights. 29(1), pp. 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238x.2023.2226948
Reasonable accommodation of employees’ parenting and care responsibilities : A human rights perspective
Swannie, Bill. (2022). Reasonable accommodation of employees’ parenting and care responsibilities : A human rights perspective. Monash University Law Review. 48(2), pp. 208-237.
A critical appraisal of the media safe harbour in the Australian Consumer Law
Swannie, Bill. (2022). A critical appraisal of the media safe harbour in the Australian Consumer Law. Australian Business Law Review. 50(2), pp. 126-143.
Rights, Liberties and Restrictions
Swannie, William. (2021). Rights, Liberties and Restrictions. In Australian Constitutional Law and Government pp. 325-348 LexisNexis.
Corrective justice and redress under Australia's racial vilification laws
Swannie, Bill. (2021). Corrective justice and redress under Australia's racial vilification laws. University of Queensland Law Journal. 40(1), pp. 27-66.
Speaking back : Does counterspeech provide adequate redress for racial vilification?
Swannie, Bill. (2021). Speaking back : Does counterspeech provide adequate redress for racial vilification? Adelaide Law Review. 42(1), pp. 39-72.
Protecting victims not punishing perpetrators : Clarifying the purpose of s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act
Swannie, Bill. (2020). Protecting victims not punishing perpetrators : Clarifying the purpose of s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. Media and Arts Law Review. 24(1), pp. 24-47.
Speech acts : Is racial vilification a form of racial discrimination?
Swannie, William. (2020). Speech acts : Is racial vilification a form of racial discrimination? Adelaide Law Review. 41(1), pp. 179-216.
Racially derogatory cartoons and racial vilification laws : Where to draw the line?
Swannie, Bill. (2020). Racially derogatory cartoons and racial vilification laws : Where to draw the line? Alternative Law Journal. 45(4), pp. 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X20918663
The influence of defamation law on the interpretation of Australia’s racial vilification laws
Swannie, Bill. (2020). The influence of defamation law on the interpretation of Australia’s racial vilification laws. Torts Law Journal. 26(1), pp. 34-72.
From Alienation to Empowerment : How Legal Educators Can Support Student Wellbeing
Swannie, William. (2019). From Alienation to Empowerment : How Legal Educators Can Support Student Wellbeing. In Wellness for Law: Making Wellness Core Business pp. 123-129 Lexis Nexis Australia.
Are racial vilification laws supported by free speech arguments?
Swannie, Bill. (2019). Are racial vilification laws supported by free speech arguments? Monash University Law Review. 44(1), pp. 71-111. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3382027
Airbnb and residential tenancy law : Do ‘home sharing’ arrangements constitute a licence or a lease?
Swannie, Bill. (2018). Airbnb and residential tenancy law : Do ‘home sharing’ arrangements constitute a licence or a lease? Adelaide Law Review. 39(2), pp. 231-247.