Minimising the International Investment Tribunal’s expansive treaty interpretation : Is ‘renegotiation’ of investment treaties a better strategy for host developing countries?
Journal article
Zaman, Khorsed and Islam, M. Rafiqul. (2022). Minimising the International Investment Tribunal’s expansive treaty interpretation : Is ‘renegotiation’ of investment treaties a better strategy for host developing countries? International Trade and Business Law Review. 23, pp. 3-44.
Authors | Zaman, Khorsed and Islam, M. Rafiqul |
---|---|
Abstract | In the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) system, international arbitration tribunals interpret investment treaties in ways that more often than not undermine the competing interests of investment importing developing countries. In a bid to overcome such interpretations, some host countries have resorted to stark options: terminating their bilateral investment treaties (BITS), denouncing International Investment Agreements (IIAs), and withdrawing from the international investment arbitration system - a trend set to continue. They are also in search of an alternate route that can shield them from invasive arbitral awards. This article seeks to find a better alternative. It undertakes a cost-benefit analysis of the termination of BITs and withdrawal from IIAs and ISDS from host developing countries' perspectives, particularly in the context of Bangladesh's experience in ISDS. It also examines the continuing effects on Bolivia despite its denouncement of and withdrawal from the International Centre for the Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). Upon a strategic analysis of the available options, this article argues that the renegotiation of BIT provisions susceptible to expansive arbitral interpretations appears to be a better option than other stark options to ameliorate the adverse consequences that both Bangladesh and Bolivia experienced as host developing countries. Renegotiated treaties will go a long way in limiting arbitrators' wide discretionary power of interpretation and keeping host developing countries within the regulatory regime of international investment law. |
Keywords | arbitration; investment treaties; dispute settlement; ICSID; renegotiation; investors; developing countries; investment law; umbrella clause |
Year | 2022 |
Journal | International Trade and Business Law Review |
Journal citation | 23, pp. 3-44 |
Publisher | School of Law, Murdoch University |
ISSN | 1836-8573 |
Web address (URL) | https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/itbla23&i=9 |
Page range | 3-44 |
Publisher's version | License All rights reserved File Access Level Controlled |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
Online | 2022 |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 01 Jun 2023 |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8z16w/minimising-the-international-investment-tribunal-s-expansive-treaty-interpretation-is-renegotiation-of-investment-treaties-a-better-strategy-for-host-developing-countries
Restricted files
Publisher's version
62
total views0
total downloads3
views this month0
downloads this month