The influence of defamation law on the interpretation of Australia’s racial vilification laws

Journal article


Swannie, Bill. (2020). The influence of defamation law on the interpretation of Australia’s racial vilification laws. Torts Law Journal. 26(1), pp. 34-72.
AuthorsSwannie, Bill
Abstract

This article examines the influence of defamation law on the interpretation and application of Australia’s racial vilification laws. First, it highlights the significant overlap between the types of conduct sanctioned by s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth), and the definition of defamatory matter. Both laws create liability for public communications that are insulting or abusive (even if they are satirical). Second, this article argues that both racial vilification laws and defamation law seek to protect individual dignity and autonomy. This is because public denigration of a person (including on a racial basis) effects how that person, and others similarly situated, are perceived and treated by others. Third, this article argues that not all conduct covered by Australia’s racial vilification laws can be characterised as valuable ‘political’ discussion. Rather, these laws impose liability for conduct that causes serious personal and communal harms. Finally, this article examines the exemptions to liability in Australia’s racial vilification laws. Drawing on defamation law, it articulates certain factors that are relevant to determining whether particular conduct is done ‘reasonably and in good faith’ and is therefore exempt from liability. In particular, it highlights the importance of factual accuracy, where publications are made to large audiences on public interest topics. The article argues that inaccurate and exaggerated publications are not supported by the truth-seeking rationale for protecting speech, and the harm they cause to members of target groups may be greater than the public interest in receiving such communications.

Year2020
JournalTorts Law Journal
Journal citation26 (1), pp. 34-72
PublisherLexisNexis Butterworths
ISSN1038-5967
Page range34-72
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online2020
Publication process dates
Deposited02 Jun 2023
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8z17z/the-influence-of-defamation-law-on-the-interpretation-of-australia-s-racial-vili-cation-laws

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 33
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 3
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

A critical appraisal of the 'no contact' rule
Swannie, Bill. (2023). A critical appraisal of the 'no contact' rule. Adelaide Law Review. 44(1), pp. 246-273.
Protection from forced eviction : What rights do social housing tenants have under human rights charters?
Swannie, Bill. (2023). Protection from forced eviction : What rights do social housing tenants have under human rights charters? Australian Journal of Human Rights. 29(1), pp. 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238x.2023.2226948
Protection from institutional censorship : An essential aspect of academic freedom
Swannie, Bill. (2022). Protection from institutional censorship : An essential aspect of academic freedom. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 45(4), pp. 1489-1512. https://doi.org/10.53637/DHIC5747
Reasonable accommodation of employees’ parenting and care responsibilities : A human rights perspective
Swannie, Bill. (2022). Reasonable accommodation of employees’ parenting and care responsibilities : A human rights perspective. Monash University Law Review. 48(2), pp. 208-237.
A critical appraisal of the media safe harbour in the Australian Consumer Law
Swannie, Bill. (2022). A critical appraisal of the media safe harbour in the Australian Consumer Law. Australian Business Law Review. 50(2), pp. 126-143.
Rights, Liberties and Restrictions
Swannie, William. (2021). Rights, Liberties and Restrictions. In Australian Constitutional Law and Government pp. 325-348 LexisNexis.
Corrective justice and redress under Australia's racial vilification laws
Swannie, Bill. (2021). Corrective justice and redress under Australia's racial vilification laws. University of Queensland Law Journal. 40(1), pp. 27-66.
Speaking back : Does counterspeech provide adequate redress for racial vilification?
Swannie, Bill. (2021). Speaking back : Does counterspeech provide adequate redress for racial vilification? Adelaide Law Review. 42(1), pp. 39-72.
Protecting victims not punishing perpetrators : Clarifying the purpose of s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act
Swannie, Bill. (2020). Protecting victims not punishing perpetrators : Clarifying the purpose of s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. Media and Arts Law Review. 24(1), pp. 24-47.
Speech acts : Is racial vilification a form of racial discrimination?
Swannie, William. (2020). Speech acts : Is racial vilification a form of racial discrimination? Adelaide Law Review. 41(1), pp. 179-216.
Racially derogatory cartoons and racial vilification laws : Where to draw the line?
Swannie, Bill. (2020). Racially derogatory cartoons and racial vilification laws : Where to draw the line? Alternative Law Journal. 45(4), pp. 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X20918663
From Alienation to Empowerment : How Legal Educators Can Support Student Wellbeing
Swannie, William. (2019). From Alienation to Empowerment : How Legal Educators Can Support Student Wellbeing. In Wellness for Law: Making Wellness Core Business pp. 123-129 Lexis Nexis Australia.
Are racial vilification laws supported by free speech arguments?
Swannie, Bill. (2019). Are racial vilification laws supported by free speech arguments? Monash University Law Review. 44(1), pp. 71-111. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3382027
Airbnb and residential tenancy law : Do ‘home sharing’ arrangements constitute a licence or a lease?
Swannie, Bill. (2018). Airbnb and residential tenancy law : Do ‘home sharing’ arrangements constitute a licence or a lease? Adelaide Law Review. 39(2), pp. 231-247.