Racially derogatory cartoons and racial vilification laws : Where to draw the line?

Journal article

Swannie, Bill. (2020). Racially derogatory cartoons and racial vilification laws : Where to draw the line? Alternative Law Journal. 45(4), pp. 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X20918663

Publication dates
Authors	Swannie, Bill
Abstract	This article examines whether racially derogatory cartoons are capable of infringing Part IIA of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth). In particular, it examines the exemption of ‘artistic work’ in section 18D, which depends on the artistic work being published ‘reasonably’. Courts have struggled to apply the concept of ‘reasonableness’ to cartoons, noting that cartoons are exaggerated by their nature and that they often convey political messages.
Keywords	art; human rights law; media; discrimination; race issues; vilification
Year	2020
Journal	Alternative Law Journal
Journal citation	45 (4), pp. 291-297
Publisher	SAGE Publications
ISSN	1037-969X
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)	https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X20918663
Scopus EID	2-s2.0-85083363297
Open access	Published as green open access
Page range	291-297
Author's accepted manuscript	AM_Swannie_2020_Racially_derogatory_cartoons_and_racial_vilification.pdf License CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 File Access Level Open
Publisher's version	License All rights reserved File Access Level Controlled
Output status	Published
Online	15 Apr 2020
Publication process dates
Deposited	02 Jun 2023

Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8z184/racially-derogatory-cartoons-and-racial-vilification-laws-where-to-draw-the-line

Download files

Author's accepted manuscript

	AM_Swannie_2020_Racially_derogatory_cartoons_and_racial_vilification.pdf
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File access level: Open

Restricted files

Publisher's version

(1 files)

34
total views
25
total downloads
0
views this month
0
downloads this month

These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Examining BA v The King : Can a ‘home’ provide security from domestic violence?

Swannie, William. (2024). Examining BA v The King : Can a ‘home’ provide security from domestic violence? Alternative Law Journal. 49(2), pp. 120-125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X241237015

A critical appraisal of the 'no contact' rule

Swannie, Bill. (2023). A critical appraisal of the 'no contact' rule. Adelaide Law Review. 44(1), pp. 246-273.

Protection from forced eviction : What rights do social housing tenants have under human rights charters?

Swannie, Bill. (2023). Protection from forced eviction : What rights do social housing tenants have under human rights charters? Australian Journal of Human Rights. 29(1), pp. 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238x.2023.2226948

Protection from institutional censorship : An essential aspect of academic freedom

Swannie, Bill. (2022). Protection from institutional censorship : An essential aspect of academic freedom. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 45(4), pp. 1489-1512. https://doi.org/10.53637/DHIC5747

Reasonable accommodation of employees’ parenting and care responsibilities : A human rights perspective

Swannie, Bill. (2022). Reasonable accommodation of employees’ parenting and care responsibilities : A human rights perspective. Monash University Law Review. 48(2), pp. 208-237.

A critical appraisal of the media safe harbour in the Australian Consumer Law

Swannie, Bill. (2022). A critical appraisal of the media safe harbour in the Australian Consumer Law. Australian Business Law Review. 50(2), pp. 126-143.

Rights, Liberties and Restrictions

Swannie, William. (2021). Rights, Liberties and Restrictions. In Australian Constitutional Law and Government pp. 325-348 LexisNexis.

Corrective justice and redress under Australia's racial vilification laws

Swannie, Bill. (2021). Corrective justice and redress under Australia's racial vilification laws. University of Queensland Law Journal. 40(1), pp. 27-66.

Speaking back : Does counterspeech provide adequate redress for racial vilification?

Swannie, Bill. (2021). Speaking back : Does counterspeech provide adequate redress for racial vilification? Adelaide Law Review. 42(1), pp. 39-72.

Protecting victims not punishing perpetrators : Clarifying the purpose of s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act

Swannie, Bill. (2020). Protecting victims not punishing perpetrators : Clarifying the purpose of s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. Media and Arts Law Review. 24(1), pp. 24-47.

Speech acts : Is racial vilification a form of racial discrimination?

Swannie, William. (2020). Speech acts : Is racial vilification a form of racial discrimination? Adelaide Law Review. 41(1), pp. 179-216.

The influence of defamation law on the interpretation of Australia’s racial viliﬁcation laws

Swannie, Bill. (2020). The influence of defamation law on the interpretation of Australia’s racial viliﬁcation laws. Torts Law Journal. 26(1), pp. 34-72.

From Alienation to Empowerment : How Legal Educators Can Support Student Wellbeing

Swannie, William. (2019). From Alienation to Empowerment : How Legal Educators Can Support Student Wellbeing. In Wellness for Law: Making Wellness Core Business pp. 123-129 Lexis Nexis Australia.

Are racial vilification laws supported by free speech arguments?

Swannie, Bill. (2019). Are racial vilification laws supported by free speech arguments? Monash University Law Review. 44(1), pp. 71-111. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3382027

Airbnb and residential tenancy law : Do ‘home sharing’ arrangements constitute a licence or a lease?

Swannie, Bill. (2018). Airbnb and residential tenancy law : Do ‘home sharing’ arrangements constitute a licence or a lease? Adelaide Law Review. 39(2), pp. 231-247.