Protecting victims not punishing perpetrators : Clarifying the purpose of s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act

Journal article


Swannie, Bill. (2020). Protecting victims not punishing perpetrators : Clarifying the purpose of s 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. Media and Arts Law Review. 24(1), pp. 24-47.
AuthorsSwannie, Bill
Abstract

Section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) makes certain conduct ‘unlawful’, and it allows an ‘aggrieved’ person to make a complaint, and potentially obtain remedies, in respect of that conduct. This article argues that s 18C establishes a civil means of redress that seeks to protect individuals and groups from the harms of racial vilification. This primary purpose for which s 18C was enacted is evident from the terms of the section, from parliamentary debate on the provisions, and various reports referred to in that debate. Several other purposes were also mentioned in parliamentary debate, such as Parliament’s desire to promote social harmony and tolerance, and to eliminate racial hatred or prejudice. However, these broader social goals were not Parliament’s primary goal in enacting s 18C. Indeed, overemphasising these considerations has contributed to confusion surrounding s 18C and its proper interpretation.

Year2020
JournalMedia and Arts Law Review
Journal citation24 (1), pp. 24-47
PublisherLexisNexis Butterworths
ISSN1325-1570
Web address (URL)https://advance.lexis.com/api/permalink/be5053d6-f964-428b-bf4c-1d9cc725f2be/?context=1201008&federationidp=9QNBBC37542
Page range24-47
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online2020
Publication process dates
Deposited09 Jun 2023
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8z20z/protecting-victims-not-punishing-perpetrators-clarifying-the-purpose-of-s-18c-of-the-racial-discrimination-act

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 28
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 3
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

A critical appraisal of the 'no contact' rule
Swannie, Bill. (2023). A critical appraisal of the 'no contact' rule. Adelaide Law Review. 44(1), pp. 246-273.
Protection from forced eviction : What rights do social housing tenants have under human rights charters?
Swannie, Bill. (2023). Protection from forced eviction : What rights do social housing tenants have under human rights charters? Australian Journal of Human Rights. 29(1), pp. 23-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238x.2023.2226948
Protection from institutional censorship : An essential aspect of academic freedom
Swannie, Bill. (2022). Protection from institutional censorship : An essential aspect of academic freedom. University of New South Wales Law Journal. 45(4), pp. 1489-1512. https://doi.org/10.53637/DHIC5747
Reasonable accommodation of employees’ parenting and care responsibilities : A human rights perspective
Swannie, Bill. (2022). Reasonable accommodation of employees’ parenting and care responsibilities : A human rights perspective. Monash University Law Review. 48(2), pp. 208-237.
A critical appraisal of the media safe harbour in the Australian Consumer Law
Swannie, Bill. (2022). A critical appraisal of the media safe harbour in the Australian Consumer Law. Australian Business Law Review. 50(2), pp. 126-143.
Rights, Liberties and Restrictions
Swannie, William. (2021). Rights, Liberties and Restrictions. In Australian Constitutional Law and Government pp. 325-348 LexisNexis.
Corrective justice and redress under Australia's racial vilification laws
Swannie, Bill. (2021). Corrective justice and redress under Australia's racial vilification laws. University of Queensland Law Journal. 40(1), pp. 27-66.
Speaking back : Does counterspeech provide adequate redress for racial vilification?
Swannie, Bill. (2021). Speaking back : Does counterspeech provide adequate redress for racial vilification? Adelaide Law Review. 42(1), pp. 39-72.
Speech acts : Is racial vilification a form of racial discrimination?
Swannie, William. (2020). Speech acts : Is racial vilification a form of racial discrimination? Adelaide Law Review. 41(1), pp. 179-216.
Racially derogatory cartoons and racial vilification laws : Where to draw the line?
Swannie, Bill. (2020). Racially derogatory cartoons and racial vilification laws : Where to draw the line? Alternative Law Journal. 45(4), pp. 291-297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X20918663
The influence of defamation law on the interpretation of Australia’s racial vilification laws
Swannie, Bill. (2020). The influence of defamation law on the interpretation of Australia’s racial vilification laws. Torts Law Journal. 26(1), pp. 34-72.
From Alienation to Empowerment : How Legal Educators Can Support Student Wellbeing
Swannie, William. (2019). From Alienation to Empowerment : How Legal Educators Can Support Student Wellbeing. In Wellness for Law: Making Wellness Core Business pp. 123-129 Lexis Nexis Australia.
Are racial vilification laws supported by free speech arguments?
Swannie, Bill. (2019). Are racial vilification laws supported by free speech arguments? Monash University Law Review. 44(1), pp. 71-111. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3382027
Airbnb and residential tenancy law : Do ‘home sharing’ arrangements constitute a licence or a lease?
Swannie, Bill. (2018). Airbnb and residential tenancy law : Do ‘home sharing’ arrangements constitute a licence or a lease? Adelaide Law Review. 39(2), pp. 231-247.