‘Low-normal’ motor skills in infants at high risk for poor developmental outcomes : A prevalence and prognostic study

Journal article


Danks, Marcella, Flynn, Emma J., Gray, Peter H. and Hurrion, Elizabeth M.. (2022). ‘Low-normal’ motor skills in infants at high risk for poor developmental outcomes : A prevalence and prognostic study. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology. 64(12), pp. 1517-1523. https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15267
AuthorsDanks, Marcella, Flynn, Emma J., Gray, Peter H. and Hurrion, Elizabeth M.
Abstract

Aim
To investigate the prevalence and prognostic value of ‘low-normal’ motor skills in infants at high-risk for poor developmental outcomes.

Method
Infants born extremely low-birthweight and extremely preterm discharged from neonatal intensive care between 2015 and 2018 completed the Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS), Neuro-Sensory Motor Developmental Assessment (NSMDA) at corrected age 4, 8, and 12 months, and Griffiths Mental Development Scale at corrected age 12 months.

Results
Participating infants (n = 191) with a mean gestational age (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 26.80 weeks (26.60, 27.1) and mean birthweight (95% CI) of 869 grams (843, 895) included 45 (23.80%) infants small for gestational age. AIMS rated 50.32%, 35.37%, and 14.86% of infants within the ‘low-normal’ motor skills range (1–2 SD below the mean for age) at 4, 8, and 12 months respectively. Of the infants within the AIMS ‘low-normal’ skills range, 55.70%, 88.46%, and 59.10% were classified as having impairment by NSMDA at 4, 8, and 12 months respectively. Griffiths assessment at 12 months identified only 7.33% of infants with ‘low-normal’ skills and 3.33% with motor disability. Minimal motor impairment rating on the NSMDA at 4 or 8 months significantly predicted general development at 12 months.

Interpretation
High-risk infants with ‘low-normal’ motor skills may warrant referral to early intervention as associated impairment represents increased risk for poorer general development outcomes.

What this paper adds
• High prevalence of ‘low-normal’ motor skill exists in high-risk infants.
• Clinical motor assessment validly identifies infants with motor impairment.
• Minimal motor impairment in high-risk infants is prognostic of general development.
• High-risk infants with ‘low-normal’ motor skills may warrant early intervention.
• Griffiths Scales of Child Development, Third Edition assessment at 12-months age may under-identify motor difficulties.

Year2022
JournalDevelopmental Medicine and Child Neurology
Journal citation64 (12), pp. 1517-1523
PublisherWiley
ISSN0012-1622
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1111/dmcn.15267
PubMed ID35598100
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85130287454
Page range1517-1523
FunderMater Mothers' Hospital
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online21 May 2022
Publication process dates
Accepted15 Apr 2022
Deposited26 Jul 2023
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8z63w/-low-normal-motor-skills-in-infants-at-high-risk-for-poor-developmental-outcomes-a-prevalence-and-prognostic-study

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 20
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 2
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Development of a clinical framework for the assessment of dyskinesia and function in the upper limb in children with cerebral palsy
Ralph, Edward, Carroll, Kate, Danks, Marcella and Harvey, Adrienne. (2023). Development of a clinical framework for the assessment of dyskinesia and function in the upper limb in children with cerebral palsy. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics. 43(1), pp. 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01942638.2022.2104149
Are behaviour problems in extremely low-birthweight children related to their motor ability?
Danks, Marcella, Cherry, Kate, Burns, Yvonne and Gray, Peter. (2017). Are behaviour problems in extremely low-birthweight children related to their motor ability? Acta Paediatrica. 106(4), pp. 568 - 572. https://doi.org/10.1111/apa.13712
Perinatal factors in non-disabled ELBW school children and later performance
Zanudin, Asfarina, Gray, Peter H., Burns, Yvonne, Danks, Marcella Therese, Watter, Pauline and Poulsen, Leith. (2013). Perinatal factors in non-disabled ELBW school children and later performance. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. 49(1), pp. E62 - E67. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12022
Perinatal events and motor performance of children born with ELBW and nondisabled
Zanudin, Asfarina, Burns, Yvonne, Gray, Peter, Danks, Marcella Therese, Poulsen, Leith and Watter, Pauline. (2013). Perinatal events and motor performance of children born with ELBW and nondisabled. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 25(1), pp. 30 - 35. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEP.0b013e31827aa424
Fitness limitations in non-disabled extremely low birthweight adolescents
Danks, Marcella, Burns, Yvonne, Gibbons, Kristen, Gray, Peter, O'Callaghan, Michael, Poulsen, Leith and Watter, Pauline. (2013). Fitness limitations in non-disabled extremely low birthweight adolescents. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.12281
The long-term predictive validity of early motor development in "apparently normal" ELBW survivors
Danks, Marcella, Maideen, Mohammad Fauzan, Burns, Yvonne, O'Callaghan, Michael, Gray, Peter, Watter, Pauline, Poulsen, Leith and Gibbons, Kristen. (2012). The long-term predictive validity of early motor development in "apparently normal" ELBW survivors. Early Human Development. 88(8), pp. 637 - 641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2012.01.010
How useful is early motor testing in neurologically normal ELBW children?
Danks, Marcella, Fauzan, Mohammad Fauzan, Burns, Yvonne, O'Callaghan, Michael, Gray, Peter, Poulsen, Leith, Watter, Pauline and Gibbons, Kristen. (2012). How useful is early motor testing in neurologically normal ELBW children? 2008 AusACPDM Conference : Broadening the Scope. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia 10 - 13 Apr 2008 United Kingdom: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 56 - 56