Modern innovative solutions to improve outcomes in severe asthma : Protocol for a mixed methods observational comparison of clinical outcomes in mission versus current care delivery

Journal article


Roberts, Claire, Lanning, Eleanor, Fogg, Carole, Bassett, Paul, Hughes, Alison and Chauhan, Anoop J.. (2019). Modern innovative solutions to improve outcomes in severe asthma : Protocol for a mixed methods observational comparison of clinical outcomes in mission versus current care delivery. JMIR Research Protocols. 8(10), p. Article e9585. https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.9585
AuthorsRoberts, Claire, Lanning, Eleanor, Fogg, Carole, Bassett, Paul, Hughes, Alison and Chauhan, Anoop J.
Abstract

Background: Asthma that is poorly controlled and undertreated can progress to more severe disease that is associated with high levels of unscheduled care that requires high-cost therapy, leading to a significant health economic burden. The identification and appropriate referral to a specialist asthma service is also often delayed by several months or years because of poor recognition and understanding of symptom severity. Current severe asthma services may take several months to provide a comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment, often necessitating multiple hospital visits and costing up to £5000 per patient.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate whether a new service model could identify poorly controlled and potentially severe asthma much earlier in the patient pathway, and then compare clinical outcomes between this new care model with standard care.

Methods: Modern Innovative Solutions to Improve Outcomes in (MISSION) Severe Asthma is a novel service model developed by asthma specialists from Portsmouth and Southampton severe asthma services. MISSION Severe Asthma identified patients with poorly controlled disease from general practice databases who had not been under secondary outpatient care in the last 12 months or who were not known to secondary care. In 1- or 2-stop assessments, a thorough review of diagnosis, disease phenotype, and control is undertaken, and clinical outcomes collected at baseline.

Results: A variety of clinical outcomes will be collected to assess the service model. The results will be reported in February 2020.

Conclusions: This protocol outlines a mixed methods study to assess the impact on disease control, unscheduled health care usage, and quality of life in patients seen in the MISSION clinic compared with a closely matched cohort who declined to attend.

Keywordsasthma; diagnosis; community health services; drug therapy; epidemiology; asthma treatment
Year2019
JournalJMIR Research Protocols
Journal citation8 (10), p. Article e9585
PublisherJMIR Publications Inc.
ISSN1929-0748
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.2196/resprot.9585
PubMed ID31603434
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85095763987
PubMed Central ID6913683
Open accessOpen access
Page range1-11
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online10 Oct 2019
Publication process dates
Accepted30 Oct 2018
Deposited07 Sep 2023
Additional information

International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID):
DERR1-10.2196/9585

Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8z9q5/modern-innovative-solutions-to-improve-outcomes-in-severe-asthma-protocol-for-a-mixed-methods-observational-comparison-of-clinical-outcomes-in-mission-versus-current-care-delivery

Download files


Publisher's version
  • 13
    total views
  • 10
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Street-level bureaucracy and policy implementation in community public health nursing : A qualitative study of the experiences of student and novice health visitors
Hughes, Alison and Condon, Louise. (2016). Street-level bureaucracy and policy implementation in community public health nursing : A qualitative study of the experiences of student and novice health visitors. Primary Health Care Research and Development. 17(6), pp. 586-598. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1463423616000220