Restraint of shareholder voice in Australia : Corporate governance, corporate law and politics

Journal article


Sheehy, Benedict, Pender, Howard and Diaz-Granados, Juan. (2022). Restraint of shareholder voice in Australia : Corporate governance, corporate law and politics. Australian Journal of Corporate Law. 37(2), pp. 79-113.
AuthorsSheehy, Benedict, Pender, Howard and Diaz-Granados, Juan
Abstract

Shareholders’ right of expression is a fundamental right of oversight counterbalancing directors’ exercise of power. Companies are not simply economic institutions. They are also social institutions, organisations expressing values including expressions of political views. The views of the company ought to be the views of the members, and not simply another opportunity for directors to express their views as managers. In Australia, corporate political speech has been treated as an ordinary management function, despite its different nonmanagerial nature. The importance of the right of expression, generally, and the right of political expression, particularly, has been largely ignored, overlooked or otherwise diminished by law. Australian arrangements for the lodgement of shareholder resolutions allow much less scope for public disagreement about matters of corporate governance, strategy and political voice to be addressed in an open, contestable forum. This situation stymies a gradual, non-antagonistic approach and impinges the well-being and effective monitoring and functioning of Australian companies.

This article explores the development of the shareholders’ right of expression in Australia and other Anglophone countries. It shows that the ‘right of expression’, particularly the right of political expression, is lagging in Australia, especially after the 2016 decision of Australasian Centre for Corporate Responsibility v Commonwealth Bank of Australia. This article argues that advisory resolutions improve shareholder oversight and the accountability of company boards and provides greater legitimacy in terms of the right of political expression. Consequently, it advocates for reconsideration and reform. This analysis advances the debate and helps to recognise the deficiencies that exist in Australian corporate law with respect to shareholders’ rights.

Year2022
JournalAustralian Journal of Corporate Law
Journal citation37 (2), pp. 79-113
PublisherLexisNexis Butterworths
ISSN1037-4124
Web address (URL)https://advance.lexis.com/api/document?collection=analytical-materials-au&id=urn:contentItem:650P-KCC1-JSJC-X001-00000-00&context=1201008
Page range79-113
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online2022
Publication process dates
Deposited11 Oct 2023
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8zv85/restraint-of-shareholder-voice-in-australia-corporate-governance-corporate-law-and-politics

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 76
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Cognition, Language, and Law : Introspective Reflections on How we Learn, Teach, and Understand Law Across Languages and Legal Systems
Diaz-Granados Prieto, Juan Jose. (2024). Cognition, Language, and Law : Introspective Reflections on How we Learn, Teach, and Understand Law Across Languages and Legal Systems. International Journal of Law, Language & Discourse. pp. 1-11. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4878141
Social Enterprise : A Legal Definition of the Term
Sheehy, Benedict and Diaz-Granados Prieto, Juan Jose. (2023). Social Enterprise : A Legal Definition of the Term. In In Brakman Reiser, Dana, Dean, Steven A. and Lideikyte Huber, Giedre (Ed.). Social Enterprise Law: A Multijurisdictional Comparative Review pp. 635 - 650 Intersentia.
‘Standard Jural Relations of Ownership’ : A Novel Theoretical Framework Informed by Wesley Hohfeld and Tony Honoré
Diaz-Granados Prieto, Juan Jose. (2023). ‘Standard Jural Relations of Ownership’ : A Novel Theoretical Framework Informed by Wesley Hohfeld and Tony Honoré. Monash University Law Review. 49(2), pp. 1-27. https://doi.org/10.26180/24559129
Legal problems and solutions in stablecoins : A multi-disciplinary approach applied to Euro stablecoins
Sheehy, Benedict, Hawkins, John and Diaz-Granados Prieto, Juan Jose. (2023). Legal problems and solutions in stablecoins : A multi-disciplinary approach applied to Euro stablecoins. Review of Law and Economics. 19(1), pp. 85-98. https://doi.org/10.1515/rle-2022-0053
Power imbalance in the sharing economy platform technologies : Potential solutions from contract law
Diaz-Granados, Juan and Sheehy, Benedict. (2023). Power imbalance in the sharing economy platform technologies : Potential solutions from contract law. Australian Business Law Review. 50(6), pp. 398-420.
Employees, contractors and hybrid workers : Rethinking legal categories in the sharing economy’s platform-user-provider model
Diaz-Granados, Juan and Sheehy, Benedict. (2022). Employees, contractors and hybrid workers : Rethinking legal categories in the sharing economy’s platform-user-provider model. Australian Business Law Review. 50(4), pp. 240-269.
Potential legal categories in the sharing economy's platform operator-user-provider-model : A taxonomic and positive approach - Part 1
Diaz-Granados Prieto, Juan. (2022). Potential legal categories in the sharing economy's platform operator-user-provider-model : A taxonomic and positive approach - Part 1. Jurimetrics. 62(2), pp. 197-224.
What to teach when teaching law : The Categories, Rights, Duties And Test (‘CRDT’) Framework
Sheehy, Ben, Diaz-Granados, Juan and Fitzgerald, Tomas. (2022). What to teach when teaching law : The Categories, Rights, Duties And Test (‘CRDT’) Framework. Canberra Law Review. 19(1), pp. 36-51.
Potential legal categories in the sharing economy's platform operator-user-provider model : A taxonomic and positive approach — Part 2
Diaz-Granados, Juan. (2022). Potential legal categories in the sharing economy's platform operator-user-provider model : A taxonomic and positive approach — Part 2. Jurimetrics. 62(3), pp. 241-283.
The Sharing Economy & the platform operator-user-provider “PUP Model” : Analytical legal frameworks
Diaz-Granados, Juan and Sheehy, Benedict. (2021). The Sharing Economy & the platform operator-user-provider “PUP Model” : Analytical legal frameworks. Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal. 31(4), pp. 997-1041.