Results of the COMPARE trial of Constraint-induced or Multimodality Aphasia Therapy compared with usual care in chronic post-stroke aphasia
Journal article
Rose, Miranda L., Nickels, Lyndsey, Copland, David, Togher, Leanne, Godecke, Erin, Meinzer, Marcus, Rai, Tapan, Cadilhac, Dominique A., Kim, Joosup, Hurley, Melanie, Foster, Abby, Carragher, Marcella, Wilcox, Cassie, Pierce, John E. and Steel, Gillian. (2022). Results of the COMPARE trial of Constraint-induced or Multimodality Aphasia Therapy compared with usual care in chronic post-stroke aphasia. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry. 93(6), pp. 573-581. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-328422
Authors | Rose, Miranda L., Nickels, Lyndsey, Copland, David, Togher, Leanne, Godecke, Erin, Meinzer, Marcus, Rai, Tapan, Cadilhac, Dominique A., Kim, Joosup, Hurley, Melanie, Foster, Abby, Carragher, Marcella, Wilcox, Cassie, Pierce, John E. and Steel, Gillian |
---|---|
Abstract | Background While meta-analyses confirm treatment for chronic post-stroke aphasia is effective, a lack of comparative evidence for different interventions limits prescription accuracy. We investigated whether Constraint-Induced Aphasia Therapy Plus (CIAT-plus) and/or Multimodality Aphasia Therapy (M-MAT) provided greater therapeutic benefit compared with usual community care and were differentially effective according to baseline aphasia severity. Methods We conducted a three-arm, multicentre, parallel group, open-label, blinded endpoint, phase III, randomised-controlled trial. We stratified eligible participants by baseline aphasia on the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised Aphasia Quotient (WAB-R-AQ). Groups of three participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to 30 hours of CIAT-Plus or M-MAT or to usual care (UC). Primary outcome was change in aphasia severity (WAB-R-AQ) from baseline to therapy completion analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included word retrieval, connected speech, functional communication, multimodal communication, quality of life and costs. Results We analysed 201 participants (70 in CIAT-Plus, 70 in M-MAT and 61 in UC). Aphasia severity was not significantly different between groups at postintervention: 1.05 points (95% CI −0.78 to 2.88; p=0.36) UC group vs CIAT-Plus; 1.06 points (95% CI −0.78 to 2.89; p=0.36) UC group vs M-MAT; 0.004 points (95% CI −1.76 to 1.77; p=1.00) CIAT-Plus vs M-MAT. Word retrieval, functional communication and communication-related quality of life were significantly improved following CIAT-Plus and M-MAT. Word retrieval benefits were maintained at 12-week follow-up. Conclusions CIAT-Plus and M-MAT were effective for word retrieval, functional communication, and quality of life, while UC was not. Future studies should explore predictive characteristics of responders and impacts of maintenance doses. Trial registration number ACTRN 2615000618550. |
Year | 2022 |
Journal | Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry |
Journal citation | 93 (6), pp. 573-581 |
Publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
ISSN | 0022-3050 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2021-328422 |
PubMed ID | 35396340 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-85128510074 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC9148985 |
Open access | Published as ‘gold’ (paid) open access |
Page range | 573-581 |
Funder | National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) |
La Trobe University | |
Publisher's version | License File Access Level Open |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
Online | 08 Apr 2022 |
Publication process dates | |
Accepted | 09 Mar 2022 |
Deposited | 01 Nov 2023 |
Grant ID | 1083010 |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8zy05/results-of-the-compare-trial-of-constraint-induced-or-multimodality-aphasia-therapy-compared-with-usual-care-in-chronic-post-stroke-aphasia
Download files
Publisher's version
OA_Rose_2022_Results_of_the_COMPARE_trial_of.pdf | |
License: CC BY 4.0 | |
File access level: Open |
31
total views35
total downloads1
views this month0
downloads this month