Nuclear weapons, the United States and alliances in Europe and Asia : Toward an institutional perspective

Journal article


Frühling, Stephan and O'Neil, Andrew. (2017). Nuclear weapons, the United States and alliances in Europe and Asia : Toward an institutional perspective. Contemporary Security Policy. 38(1), pp. 4-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1257214
AuthorsFrühling, Stephan and O'Neil, Andrew
Abstract

America’s alliances in Europe and East Asia all involve some institutional cooperation on U.S. nuclear weapons policy, planning or employment—from consultative fora in Asia to joint policy and sharing of nuclear warheads in NATO. Such cooperation is often analyzed through the prism of “extended nuclear deterrence,” which focuses on the extension of U.S. security guarantees and their effect on potential adversaries. This article argues that this underplays the importance of institutional factors: Allies have historically addressed a range of objectives through such cooperation, which has helped to catalyze agreements about broader alliance strategy. The varied form such cooperation takes in different alliances also flows from the respective bargaining power of allies and the relative importance of consensus, rather than perceived threats. The article concludes that nuclear weapons cooperation will remain crucial in successful U.S. alliance management, as allies negotiate their relationship with each other in the face of geostrategic change.

Keywordsnuclear weapons; alliances; institutions; NATO; Asia; deterrence
Year2017
JournalContemporary Security Policy
Journal citation38 (1), pp. 4-25
PublisherRoutledge
ISSN1352-3260
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1257214
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85001915798
Open accessPublished as green open access
Page range4-25
FunderAustralian Research Council (ARC)
Author's accepted manuscript
License
File Access Level
Open
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online08 Dec 2016
Publication process dates
Deposited08 Nov 2023
ARC Funded ResearchThis output has been funded, wholly or partially, under the Australian Research Council Act 2001
Grant IDDP140101478
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8zy75/nuclear-weapons-the-united-states-and-alliances-in-europe-and-asia-toward-an-institutional-perspective

Download files


Author's accepted manuscript
AM_Frühling_2017_Nuclear_weapons_the_United_States_and.pdf
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File access level: Open

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 18
    total views
  • 22
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Alliances and nuclear risk : Strengthening US extended deterrence
Frühling, Stephan and O'Neil, Andrew. (2022). Alliances and nuclear risk : Strengthening US extended deterrence. Survival. 64(1), pp. 77-98. https://doi.org/10.1080/00396338.2022.2032969
Understanding the interplay between event communications and local business decision-making using signalling theory : The case of the 2018 Commonwealth Games
Carlini, Joan, Thomson, Alana, O'Neil, Andrew and Green, Amelia. (2022). Understanding the interplay between event communications and local business decision-making using signalling theory : The case of the 2018 Commonwealth Games. European Sport Management Quarterly. pp. 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/16184742.2022.2125996
Institutions, informality, and influence : Explaining nuclear cooperation in the Australia-US alliance
Frühling, Stephan and O'Neil, Andrew. (2020). Institutions, informality, and influence : Explaining nuclear cooperation in the Australia-US alliance. Australian Journal of Political Science. 55(2), pp. 135-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10361146.2019.1697199
From legacy rhetoric to business benefits: A case study of the gold coast 2018 commonwealth game
Carlini, Joan, Coghlan, Alexandra, Thomson, Alana and O'Neil, Andrew. (2020). From legacy rhetoric to business benefits: A case study of the gold coast 2018 commonwealth game. Event Management. 24(1), pp. 75-96. https://doi.org/10.3727/152599519X15506259856057
A question of primacy? Japan, Australia and the future of the United States in Asia
Heazle, Michael and O'Neil, Andrew. (2018). A question of primacy? Japan, Australia and the future of the United States in Asia. In In Heazle, Michael and O'Neil, Andrew (Ed.). China's Rise and Australia–Japan–US Relations : Primacy and Leadership in East Asia pp. 3 - 17 Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110938.00008
US leadership and Asia’s liberal order : current and future challenges for regional allies and partners
Heazle, Michael and O'Neil, Andrew. (2018). US leadership and Asia’s liberal order : current and future challenges for regional allies and partners. In China's Rise and Australia–Japan–US Relations: Primacy and Leadership in East Asia pp. 241-250 Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781788110938.00022
The Future of Alliances in Asia
O'Neil, Andrew. (2017). The Future of Alliances in Asia. In In Ganguly, Sumit, Scobell, Andrew and Chinyong Liow, Joseph (Ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Asian Security Studies, Second Edition pp. 357 Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315455655-29
Australia and the ‘Five Eyes’ intelligence network : The perils of an asymmetric alliance
O'Neil, Andrew. (2017). Australia and the ‘Five Eyes’ intelligence network : The perils of an asymmetric alliance. Australian Journal of International Affairs. 71(5), pp. 529-543. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2017.1342763
Nuclear weapons and alliance institutions in the era of President Trump
Frühling, Stephan and O'Neil, Andrew. (2017). Nuclear weapons and alliance institutions in the era of President Trump. Contemporary Security Policy. 38(1), pp. 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/13523260.2016.1277054
Fraternal foreign policy transfer? Evaluating the case of Australian Labor and British Labour
O'Neil, Andrew. (2016). Fraternal foreign policy transfer? Evaluating the case of Australian Labor and British Labour. Policy Studies. 37(5), pp. 456-470. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2016.1188909