Student self-assessment : Why do they do it?

Journal article


Yan, Zi, Brown, Gavin T. L., Lee, John Chi-Kin and Qiu, Xue-Lan. (2020). Student self-assessment : Why do they do it? Educational Psychology. 40(4), pp. 509-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038
AuthorsYan, Zi, Brown, Gavin T. L., Lee, John Chi-Kin and Qiu, Xue-Lan
Abstract

This study explores factors that predict students’ self-assessment intentions and practices using a framework based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour (TPB). A total of 1425 Hong Kong students (Primary 4 to Secondary 3) participated in this study. Students’ intentions and practices pertaining to self-assessment and the predictors of their intentions and practices were assessed with 11 self-report scales aligned to the TPB constructs. The psychometric properties of scales were examined with Rasch analysis and the relations among the variables were investigated with path analysis based on Rasch-calibrated person measures. The results showed that attitude, subjective norms, self-efficacy, and perceived controllability were statistically significant predictors on intention to self-assess, while self-efficacy and intention had significant influence on self-assessment practice. Psychological safety was also found to have relatively weak but significant impact on both self-assessment intention and practice. This study lays a foundation for future investigations on how to promote meaningful self-assessment behaviour which is crucial for self-regulated and life-long learning.

Keywordsself-assessment; predictor; theory of planned behaviour; Rasch measurement
Year2020
JournalEducational Psychology
Journal citation40 (4), pp. 509-532
PublisherRoutledge
ISSN0144-3410
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2019.1672038
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85074019529
Page range509-532
FunderResearch Grants Council, Hong Kong SAR (Special Administrative Region)
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online07 Oct 2019
Publication process dates
Accepted20 Sep 2019
Deposited15 Nov 2023
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/8zz13/student-self-assessment-why-do-they-do-it

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 16
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Computerized adaptive testing for ipsative tests with multidimensional pairwise-comparison items : Algorithm development and applications
Qiu, Xue-Lan, de la Torre, Jimmy, Ro, Sage and Wang, Wen-Chung. (2022). Computerized adaptive testing for ipsative tests with multidimensional pairwise-comparison items : Algorithm development and applications. Applied Psychological Measurement. 46(4), pp. 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216221084209
An empirical Q-Matrix validation method for the polytomous G-DINA model
de la Torre, Jimmy, Qiu, Xue-Lan and Santos, Kevin Carl. (2022). An empirical Q-Matrix validation method for the polytomous G-DINA model. Psychometrika. 87(2), pp. 693-724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-021-09821-x
Equity in mathematics education in Hong Kong : Evidence from TIMSS 2011 to 2019
Qiu, Xue-Lan and Leung, Frederick K. S.. (2022). Equity in mathematics education in Hong Kong : Evidence from TIMSS 2011 to 2019. Large-scale Assessments in Education. 10(1), p. Article 3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-022-00121-z
A new item response theory model for rater centrality using a hierarchical rater model approach
Qiu, Xue-Lan, Chiu, Ming Ming, Wang, Wen-Chung and Chen, Po-Hsi. (2022). A new item response theory model for rater centrality using a hierarchical rater model approach. Behavior Research Methods. 54(4), pp. 1854-1868. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01699-y
Assessment of differential statement functioning in ipsative tests with multidimensional forced-choice items
Qiu, Xue-Lan and Wang, Wen-Chung. (2021). Assessment of differential statement functioning in ipsative tests with multidimensional forced-choice items. Applied Psychological Measurement. 45(2), pp. 79-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621620965739
Multilevel modeling of cognitive diagnostic assessment : The multilevel DINA example
Wang, Wen-Chung and Qiu, Xue-Lan. (2019). Multilevel modeling of cognitive diagnostic assessment : The multilevel DINA example. Applied Psychological Measurement. 43(1), pp. 34-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621618765713
Item response theory modeling for examinee-selected items with rater effect
Liu, Chen-Wei, Qiu, Xue-Lan and Wang, Wen-Chung. (2019). Item response theory modeling for examinee-selected items with rater effect. Applied Psychological Measurement. 43(6), pp. 435-448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146621618798667