An Epistemology for Moral Naturalists

Book chapter

Perl, Caleb Herman. (2022). An Epistemology for Moral Naturalists. In Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 17 pp. 166-196 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865601.003.0007

Publication dates
Authors	Perl, Caleb Herman
Abstract	This chapter introduces a new account of moral knowledge—an account of how we make or assess claims to moral knowledge. It explains three hallmarks of moral knowledge: its apriori nature, its autonomy from scientific inquiry, and its minimalist epistemology. These hallmarks all seem like evidence against moral naturalists. The chapter shows that this new account allows moral naturalists to capture all three hallmarks. Capturing the three hallmarks undercuts a central source of evidence against moral naturalism.
Keywords	moral naturalism; moral knowledge; moral epistemology; contextualism; presupposition; apriori
Page range	166-196
Year	01 Jan 2022
Book title	Oxford Studies in Metaethics Volume 17
Publisher	Oxford University Press
Place of publication	United Kingdom
Edition	17
ISBN	978-0-19-286560-1
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)	https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192865601.003.0007
Web address (URL)	https://academic.oup.com/book/41859/chapter/354664185
Open access	Published as non-open access
Research or scholarly	Research
Publisher's version	License All rights reserved File Access Level Controlled
Output status	Published
Online	Apr 2022
Publication process dates
Deposited	24 Jan 2024
Additional information	© Caleb Perl, 2022.

Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/90174/an-epistemology-for-moral-naturalists

Restricted files

Publisher's version

(1 files)

36
total views
0
total downloads
2
views this month
0
downloads this month

These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Practical Political Liberalism

Perl, Caleb Herman. (2023). Practical Political Liberalism. In Oxford Studies in Political Philosophy: Volume 9 pp. 65-97 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198877639.003.0003

Formulating moral error theory

Perl, Caleb Herman. (2022). Formulating moral error theory. The Journal of Philosophy. 119(5), pp. 279-288. https://doi.org/10.5840/jphil2022119518

Some question-begging objections to rule consequentialism

Perl, Caleb. (2022). Some question-begging objections to rule consequentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. pp. 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2022.2056213

Solving the ideal worlds problem

Perl, Caleb Herman. (2021). Solving the ideal worlds problem. Ethics. 132(1), pp. 89-126. https://doi.org/10.1086/715289

Might moral epistemologists be asking the wrong questions?

Perl, Caleb. (2020). Might moral epistemologists be asking the wrong questions? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 100(3), pp. 556-585. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12564

A user’s guide to hybrid tools

Perl, Caleb. (2020). A user’s guide to hybrid tools. Mind. 129(513), pp. 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/MIND/FZY063

Presuppositions, attitudes, and why they matter

Perl, Caleb. (2020). Presuppositions, attitudes, and why they matter. Australasian Journal of Philosophy. 98(2), pp. 363-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/00048402.2019.1621911

Might moral epistemologists be asking the wrong questions?

Perl, Caleb. (2020). Might moral epistemologists be asking the wrong questions? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 100(3), pp. 556-585. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpr.12564

A user’s guide to hybrid tools

Perl, Caleb. (2020). A user’s guide to hybrid tools. Mind: A Quarterly review of philosophy. 129(153), pp. 129-158. https://doi.org/10.1093/MIND/FZY063

Empirical ignorance as defeating moral intuitions? A puzzle for rule consequentialists (and others)

Perl, Caleb. (2019). Empirical ignorance as defeating moral intuitions? A puzzle for rule consequentialists (and others). Analysis. 79(1), pp. 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/any003

Empirical ignorance as defeating moral intuitions? A puzzle for rule consequentialists (and others)

Perl, Caleb. (2019). Empirical ignorance as defeating moral intuitions? A puzzle for rule consequentialists (and others). Analysis. 79(1), pp. 62-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/analys/any003

Attributing error without taking a stand

Perl, Caleb and Schroeder, Mark. (2019). Attributing error without taking a stand. Philosophical Studies. 176(6), pp. 1453-1471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01248-6

Shifty contextualism about epistemics

Perl, Caleb. (2017). Shifty contextualism about epistemics. Ergo. 4(28), pp. 783-820. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.12405314.0004.028

An argument for temporalism and contingentism

Perl, Caleb. (2015). An argument for temporalism and contingentism. Philosophical Studies. 172(5), pp. 1387-1417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-014-0355-3