Non-onto-theo-logical : Parallels in Thomas Aquinas’ and Martin Heidegger’s Thought on God and Being
PhD Thesis
Acharya, R.. (2024). Non-onto-theo-logical : Parallels in Thomas Aquinas’ and Martin Heidegger’s Thought on God and Being [PhD Thesis]. Australian Catholic University Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry https://doi.org/10.26199/acu.90777
Authors | Acharya, R. |
---|---|
Type | PhD Thesis |
Qualification name | Doctor of Philosophy |
Abstract | The question of whether Thomas Aquinas’ concept of God qua be-ing (esse) exemplifies Martin Heidegger’s concept of ontotheology seems to have initially arisen in the 1950s and has since roused considerable interest in every decade thereafter, not only because of its academic and ecclesial implications, but also because, despite having been so frequently asked, it has yet to be answered decisively. This thesis is an attempt to ask and answer the question decisively, so as to draw scholarship on the question towards consensus. First, the thesis defines Heidegger’s concept of ontotheology with an account of its development, its structure, its structuration, and its implication of oblivion of be-ing (Sein) and conceptual idolatry. Second, based on this definition, the thesis demonstrates that Heidegger must have categorised Aquinas’ concept of God qua esse as ontotheological, firstly, because Heidegger judged Christianity itself ontotheological and Aquinas is Christian, and, secondly, because Aquinas’ description of metaphysics seems discussed by Heidegger as an ontotheological structure governed by an ontotheological centre, to wit, God qua esse. However, it is argued that this categorisation is falsifiable if Aquinas’ concept of God qua esse does not imply oblivion of Sein or conceptual idolatry. And the thesis proceeds to prove, third, how Aquinas’ thought of esse parallels Heidegger’s thought of Sein in an overcoming of such oblivion, and fourth, how the former’s analogically determined coordination of kataphaticism and apophaticism in his threefold way parallels the latter’s thought about how God ought to be thought in an overcoming of such idolatry. Thus, even if Heidegger was right about his concept of ontotheology in general, he was wrong in having thought that Aquinas’ concept of God qua esse exemplifies it in particular. And, by implication, Christianity is also proven non-ontotheological, at least insofar as this concept of God qua esse exemplifies it. |
Keywords | Ontotheology; Martin Heidegger; Thomas Aquinas |
Year | 2024 |
Publisher | Australian Catholic University |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.26199/acu.90777 |
Research or scholarly | Research |
Page range | i-xii, 1-262 |
Final version | License File Access Level Controlled |
Supplementary Files (Layperson Summary) | License All rights reserved File Access Level Controlled |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
24 Apr 2024 | |
Publication process dates | |
Accepted | 22 Dec 2023 |
Deposited | 13 Jun 2024 |
Additional information | This work © 2024, Rajat Acharya. |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/90777/non-onto-theo-logical-parallels-in-thomas-aquinas-and-martin-heidegger-s-thought-on-god-and-being
Restricted files
Final version
Under embargo until 24 Apr 2026
Supplementary Files (Layperson Summary)
Under embargo until 24 Apr 2026
88
total views3
total downloads11
views this month0
downloads this month