Non-onto-theo-logical : Parallels in Thomas Aquinas’ and Martin Heidegger’s Thought on God and Being

PhD Thesis


Acharya, R.. (2024). Non-onto-theo-logical : Parallels in Thomas Aquinas’ and Martin Heidegger’s Thought on God and Being [PhD Thesis]. Australian Catholic University Institute for Religion and Critical Inquiry https://doi.org/10.26199/acu.90777
AuthorsAcharya, R.
TypePhD Thesis
Qualification nameDoctor of Philosophy
Abstract

The question of whether Thomas Aquinas’ concept of God qua be-ing (esse) exemplifies Martin Heidegger’s concept of ontotheology seems to have initially arisen in the 1950s and has since roused considerable interest in every decade thereafter, not only because of its academic and ecclesial implications, but also because, despite having been so frequently asked, it has yet to be answered decisively. This thesis is an attempt to ask and answer the question decisively, so as to draw scholarship on the question towards consensus. First, the thesis defines Heidegger’s concept of ontotheology with an account of its development, its structure, its structuration, and its implication of oblivion of be-ing (Sein) and conceptual idolatry. Second, based on this definition, the thesis demonstrates that Heidegger must have categorised Aquinas’ concept of God qua esse as ontotheological, firstly, because Heidegger judged Christianity itself ontotheological and Aquinas is Christian, and, secondly, because Aquinas’ description of metaphysics seems discussed by Heidegger as an ontotheological structure governed by an ontotheological centre, to wit, God qua esse. However, it is argued that this categorisation is falsifiable if Aquinas’ concept of God qua esse does not imply oblivion of Sein or conceptual idolatry. And the thesis proceeds to prove, third, how Aquinas’ thought of esse parallels Heidegger’s thought of Sein in an overcoming of such oblivion, and fourth, how the former’s analogically determined coordination of kataphaticism and apophaticism in his threefold way parallels the latter’s thought about how God ought to be thought in an overcoming of such idolatry. Thus, even if Heidegger was right about his concept of ontotheology in general, he was wrong in having thought that Aquinas’ concept of God qua esse exemplifies it in particular. And, by implication, Christianity is also proven non-ontotheological, at least insofar as this concept of God qua esse exemplifies it.

KeywordsOntotheology; Martin Heidegger; Thomas Aquinas
Year2024
PublisherAustralian Catholic University
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.26199/acu.90777
Research or scholarlyResearch
Page rangei-xii, 1-262
Final version
License
File Access Level
Controlled
Supplementary Files (Layperson Summary)
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Print24 Apr 2024
Publication process dates
Accepted22 Dec 2023
Deposited13 Jun 2024
Additional information

This work © 2024, Rajat Acharya.

Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/90777/non-onto-theo-logical-parallels-in-thomas-aquinas-and-martin-heidegger-s-thought-on-god-and-being

Restricted files

Final version


Supplementary Files (Layperson Summary)

  • 88
    total views
  • 3
    total downloads
  • 11
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as