Mediating the claim? How ‘local ecosystems of support’ shape the operation and experience of UK social security
Journal article
Edmiston, Daniel, Robertshaw, David, Young, David, Ingold, Joanne, Gibbons, Andrea, Summers, Kate, Scullion, Lisa, Geiger, Ben Baumberg and de Vries, Robert. (2022). Mediating the claim? How ‘local ecosystems of support’ shape the operation and experience of UK social security. Social Policy and Administration : an international journal of policy and research. 56(5), pp. 775-790. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12803
Authors | Edmiston, Daniel, Robertshaw, David, Young, David, Ingold, Joanne, Gibbons, Andrea, Summers, Kate, Scullion, Lisa, Geiger, Ben Baumberg and de Vries, Robert |
---|---|
Abstract | Local state and third sector actors routinely provide support to help people navigate their right to social security and mediate their chequered relationship to it. COVID-19 has not only underlined the significance of these actors in the claims-making process, but also just how vulnerable those working within ‘local ecosystems of support’ are to external shocks and their own internal pressures. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork with organisations providing support to benefit claimants and those financially struggling during COVID-19, this paper examines the increasingly situated nature of the claims-making process across four local areas in the United Kingdom. We do so to consider what bearing ‘local ecosystems of support’ have on income adequacy, access and universality across social security systems. Our analysis demonstrates how local state and third sector actors risk amplifying inequalities that at best disadvantage, and at worst altogether exclude, particular social groups from adequate (financial) assistance. Rather than conceiving of social security as a unitary collection of social transfers, we argue that its operation needs to be understood as much more fragmented and contingent. Practitioners exhibit considerable professional autonomy and moral agency in their discretionary practice, arbitrating between competing organisational priorities, local disinvestment, and changing community needs. Our findings offer broader lessons for understanding the contemporary governance of social security across welfare states seeking to responsibilise low-income households through the modernisation of public services, localism, and welfare reforms. |
Keywords | COVID-19; discretion; localisation; social security; welfare reform |
Year | 01 Jan 2022 |
Journal | Social Policy and Administration : an international journal of policy and research |
Journal citation | 56 (5), pp. 775-790 |
Publisher | John Wiley and Sons Ltd (UK) |
ISSN | 0144-5596 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12803 |
Web address (URL) | https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/spol.12803 |
Open access | Open access |
Research or scholarly | Research |
Page range | 775-790 |
Publisher's version | License File Access Level Open |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
Online | 09 Feb 2022 |
Publication process dates | |
Accepted | 23 Jan 2022 |
Deposited | 21 Jun 2024 |
Additional information | © 2022 The Authors. Social Policy & Administration published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | |
Place of publication | United Kingdom |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/9098x/mediating-the-claim-how-local-ecosystems-of-support-shape-the-operation-and-experience-of-uk-social-security
Download files
Publisher's version
OA_Ingold_2022_Mediating_the_claim_How_local_ecosystems.pdf | |
License: CC BY 4.0 | |
File access level: Open |
21
total views12
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month