On Keeping Things in Proportion

Journal article


Lovett, Adam and Riedener, Stefan. (2019). On Keeping Things in Proportion. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: online peer-reviewed journal of moral, political and legal philosophy. 16(3), pp. 229-258. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v16i3.794
AuthorsLovett, Adam and Riedener, Stefan
Abstract

Formula One isn’t very important. You can't care about it too much. The refugee crisis is more important. You can care about it much more. In this paper we investigate how important something is. By ‘importance’ we mean how much it is fitting to care about a thing. We explore a view about this which we call Proportionalism. This view says that a thing’s importance depends on that thing’s share of the world’s total value. The more of what matters there is, the less you can care about each thing in particular. The less of what matters there is, the more you can care about each thing in particular. We argue that, in many respects, Proportionalism is superior to its competitors. It captures some intuitions they leave out and it has a powerful motivation. So, we suggest, you should keep things in proportion.

Keywordsphilosophy; importance; value; proportionalism; motivation
Year01 Jan 2019
JournalJournal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: online peer-reviewed journal of moral, political and legal philosophy
Journal citation16 (3), pp. 229-258
PublisherUniversity of Southern California Gould School of Law
ISSN1559-3061
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v16i3.794
Web address (URL)https://jesp.org/index.php/jesp/article/view/794
Open accessOpen access
Research or scholarlyResearch
Page range229-258
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online18 Oct 2019
Publication process dates
Deposited03 Sep 2024
Additional information

© 2019 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Place of publicationUnited States
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/90xq1/on-keeping-things-in-proportion

Download files


Publisher's version
OA_Lovett_2019_On_keeping_things_in_proportion.pdf
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 11
    total views
  • 6
    total downloads
  • 1
    views this month
  • 2
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

The good life as the life in touch with the good
Lovett, Adam and Riedener, Stefan. (2024). The good life as the life in touch with the good. Philosophical Studies: an international journal for philosophy in the analytic tradition. 181, pp. 1141-1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02136-4
Property and non-ideal theory
Lovett, Adam. (2023). Property and non-ideal theory. Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy. pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2023.2206846
The Loving State
Lovett, Adam. (2022). The Loving State. Inquiry : an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy. pp. 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2058080
Voter Motivation
Lovett, Adam. (2022). Voter Motivation. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: online peer-reviewed journal of moral, political and legal philosophy. 21(3), pp. 299-328. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v21i3.1255
The Possibility of Democratic Autonomy
Lovett, Adam and Zuehl, Jake. (2022). The Possibility of Democratic Autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 50(4), pp. 467-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12223
What Immigrants Owe
Lovett, Adam and Sharp, Daniel. (2021). What Immigrants Owe. Ergo : An Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 8(36), pp. 336-366. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.2237
Must egalitarians condemn representative democracy?
Lovett, Adam. (2021). Must egalitarians condemn representative democracy? Social Theory and Practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy. 47(1), pp. 171-198. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract202121116
Democratic Autonomy and the Shortcomings of Citizens
Lovett, Adam. (2021). Democratic Autonomy and the Shortcomings of Citizens. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 18(4), pp. 363-386. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-22220001
A simple proof of grounding internality
Lovett, Adam. (2019). A simple proof of grounding internality. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy. 8(3), pp. 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.416