The ethics of asymmetric politics

Journal article


Lovett, Adam. (2023). The ethics of asymmetric politics. Politics, Philosophy and Economics. 22(1), pp. 3-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X221133445
AuthorsLovett, Adam
Abstract

Polarization often happens asymmetrically. One political actor radicalizes, and the results reverberate through the political system. This is how the deep divisions in contemporary American politics arose: the Republican Party radicalized. Republican officeholders began to use extreme legislative tactics. Republican voters became animated by contempt for their political rivals and by the defense of their own social superiority. The party as a whole launched a wide-ranging campaign of voter suppression and its members endorsed violence in the face of electoral defeat. This paper is about how such asymmetric polarization affects everyone else’s obligations. My core claim is that two kinds of relationship – civic friendship and non-subordination – underpin critical democratic norms. Republican misbehavior has severed cross-partisan civic friendships. Their authoritarianism forfeits their claim to non-subordination. The former means that non-Republicans need not justify policy on public grounds. The latter undercuts Republicans’ claim to enjoy minority vetoes when out of power and it gives their rivals reason to disobey the laws that Republicans make when they are in power. More generally, when one political actor contravenes the proper norms of democratic politics, their opposition is not bound by those norms.

KeywordsPolarization; public justification; political authority; civic friendship; non-subordination; non-ideal theory
Year01 Jan 2023
JournalPolitics, Philosophy and Economics
Journal citation22 (1), pp. 3-30
PublisherSage Publications Ltd. (UK)
ISSN1470-594X
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X221133445
Web address (URL)https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1470594X221133445
Open accessPublished as non-open access
Research or scholarlyResearch
Page range3-30
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online07 Nov 2022
Publication process dates
Deposited26 Nov 2024
Additional information

© The Author(s) 2022.

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Place of publicationUnited States
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/91164/the-ethics-of-asymmetric-politics

Download files


Publisher's version
OA_Lovett_2022_The_ethics_of_asymmetric_politics.pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 2
    total views
  • 1
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

The good life as the life in touch with the good
Lovett, Adam and Riedener, Stefan. (2024). The good life as the life in touch with the good. Philosophical Studies: an international journal for philosophy in the analytic tradition. 181, pp. 1141-1165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-024-02136-4
Property and non-ideal theory
Lovett, Adam. (2023). Property and non-ideal theory. Inquiry: an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy. pp. 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2023.2206846
The Loving State
Lovett, Adam. (2022). The Loving State. Inquiry : an interdisciplinary journal of philosophy. pp. 1-37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2022.2058080
Voter Motivation
Lovett, Adam. (2022). Voter Motivation. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: online peer-reviewed journal of moral, political and legal philosophy. 21(3), pp. 299-328. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v21i3.1255
The Possibility of Democratic Autonomy
Lovett, Adam and Zuehl, Jake. (2022). The Possibility of Democratic Autonomy. Philosophy and Public Affairs. 50(4), pp. 467-498. https://doi.org/10.1111/papa.12223
Group Agents and Moral Status : What Can We Owe to Organizations?
Lovett, Adam and Riedener, Stefan. (2021). Group Agents and Moral Status : What Can We Owe to Organizations? Canadian Journal of Philosophy. 51(3), pp. 221-238. https://doi.org/10.1017/can.2021.8
What Immigrants Owe
Lovett, Adam and Sharp, Daniel. (2021). What Immigrants Owe. Ergo : An Open Access Journal of Philosophy. 8(36), pp. 336-366. https://doi.org/10.3998/ergo.2237
Must egalitarians condemn representative democracy?
Lovett, Adam. (2021). Must egalitarians condemn representative democracy? Social Theory and Practice: an international and interdisciplinary journal of social philosophy. 47(1), pp. 171-198. https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract202121116
Democratic Autonomy and the Shortcomings of Citizens
Lovett, Adam. (2021). Democratic Autonomy and the Shortcomings of Citizens. Journal of Moral Philosophy. 18(4), pp. 363-386. https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-22220001
The puzzles of ground
Lovett, Adam. (2020). The puzzles of ground. Philosophical Studies : an international journal for philosophy in the analytic tradition. 177(9), pp. 2541-2564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-019-01325-w
The logic of ground
Lovett, Adam. (2020). The logic of ground. Journal of Philosophical Logic. 49(1), pp. 13-49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-019-09511-1
A simple proof of grounding internality
Lovett, Adam. (2019). A simple proof of grounding internality. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy. 8(3), pp. 154-166. https://doi.org/10.1002/tht3.416
On Keeping Things in Proportion
Lovett, Adam and Riedener, Stefan. (2019). On Keeping Things in Proportion. Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy: online peer-reviewed journal of moral, political and legal philosophy. 16(3), pp. 229-258. https://doi.org/10.26556/jesp.v16i3.794