The pragmatics of normative disagreement
Book chapter
Finlay, Stephen. (2014). The pragmatics of normative disagreement. In In Fletcher, Guy and Ridge, Michael (Ed.). Having it Both Ways : Hybrid Theories and Modern Metaethics pp. 124 - 148 Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199347582.003.0006
Authors | Finlay, Stephen |
---|---|
Editors | Fletcher, Guy and Ridge, Michael |
Abstract | [Extract] On their surface, moral and normative sentences appear descriptive. But what kinds of facts could they describe? Many have been drawn to the idea that normative words like ‘ought’ and ‘good’ are used to refer to relational properties, consisting in a relation to something like a standard, rule, desire, or end, which can vary between contexts. On my preferred view, to say that s ought to φ is |
Page range | 124 - 148 |
Year | 01 Jan 2014 |
Book title | Having it Both Ways : Hybrid Theories and Modern Metaethics |
Publisher | Oxford University Press |
Place of publication | United States |
Edition | 1 |
Series | Oxford Moral Theory Series |
ISBN | 978-0-19-934758-2 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199347582.003.0006 |
Web address (URL) | https://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/acu/detail.action?pq-origsite=primo&docID=3056365 |
Open access | Published as non-open access |
Research or scholarly | Research |
Publisher's version | License All rights reserved File Access Level Controlled |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
2014 | |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 05 Dec 2024 |
Additional information | © Oxford University Press 2014 All rights reserved. |
Permalink -
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/911vz/the-pragmatics-of-normative-disagreement
Restricted files
Publisher's version
(1 files)
3
total views0
total downloads3
views this month0
downloads this month