Should social security reachfurther? Ineligibility for benefits at the start of COVID-19

Project report


Geiger, Ben Baumberg, Scullion, Lisa, Summers, Kate, Martin, Philip, Lawler, Cormac, Edmiston, Daniel, Gibbons, Andrea, Ingold, Jo, Robertshaw, David and de Vries, Robert. (2021). Should social security reachfurther? Ineligibility for benefits at the start of COVID-19 United Kingdom: The Health Foundation.
AuthorsGeiger, Ben Baumberg, Scullion, Lisa, Summers, Kate, Martin, Philip, Lawler, Cormac, Edmiston, Daniel, Gibbons, Andrea, Ingold, Jo, Robertshaw, David and de Vries, Robert
TypeProject report
Abstract

The situation of those who were ineligible for benefits but who may be in financial need has been given little attention. In this report, we present the findings of exploratory research into this group, funded by the Health Foundation.

Among people who may have been financially struggling, we estimate that in July-August 2020 there were:

• 200,000 people ineligible for Universal Credit (UC) solely due to their partner’s earnings;
• 200,000 people ineligible for UC solely due to their savings; and
• At least 50,000 people ineligible for UC solely due to migration status.

More broadly, we estimate that there were about half a million (480,000-540,000) people who had lost 10% or more of their income during the pandemic and may have been financially struggling but were ineligible for both UC and contributory benefits (new style JSA). Half of this group overlaps with the three previous groups, but half of this group were ineligible for UC for more than one reason.

These are mostly not employees that had completely lost their jobs, but were instead primarily people with reduced income/hours (including furlough) or who were self-employed and not getting enough work. Levels of financial strain among most of these groups was relatively high (with the exception of those ineligible solely due to savings). Around 40% of each group reported severe financial strain, and about 50% of each group reported poor mental health. We estimate that there were 70,000 people [50,000-90,000] recently skipping meals where their income fell but they were ineligible for benefits.

Many people in these groups had strong feelings about the fairness of being ineligible for benefits (if they thought they were ineligible). Among those who may have been financially struggling, the majority of those ineligible solely due to their migration status felt it was unfair, as did around half of those ineligible solely due to savings or partner earnings, or who had experienced an income shock and were ineligible for benefits.

Unsuccessful UC/JSA/ESA claimants
We also estimate that 290,000 people unsuccessfully tried to claim UC, JSA or ESA during the start of the COVID-19 pandemic (and a further 350,000 people considered making a claim without beginning an application). The largest group of unsuccessful claimants are those who applied for benefits but were rejected because they did not meet the eligibility criteria (230,000 people).

In the absence of benefit income and often facing sharp income drops, unsuccessful claimants used several different ways of getting by financially: most commonly using savings, relying on friends/family, or borrowing from a bank/credit card. Yet even so, many were struggling financially. Nearly half (46.9%) reported severe financial strain. Some (15.2%) had been hungry because they had skipped a meal in the previous two weeks, equivalent to 45,000 people. Unsuccessful claimants also had much higher levels of mental ill-health than the general population (excluding claimants).

Year2021
PublisherThe Health Foundation
Place of publicationUnited Kingdom
Page range1-42
Web address (URL)https://www.distantwelfare.co.uk/ineligibility-report
FunderEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online18 May 2021
Publication process dates
Deposited24 Feb 2025
ISBN9781912337453
Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/91559/should-social-security-reachfurther-ineligibility-for-benefits-at-the-start-of-covid-19

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 0
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Welfare attitudes in a crisis : How COVID exceptionalism undermined greater solidarity
de Vries, Robert, Geiger, Ben Baumberg, Scullion, Lisa, Summers, Kate, Edmiston, Daniel, Ingold, Joanne, Robertshaw, David and Young, David. (2023). Welfare attitudes in a crisis : How COVID exceptionalism undermined greater solidarity. Journal of Social Policy. pp. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279423000466
‘What about me?’ : An analysis of employers’ engagement with employment service providers in Australia
Ingold, Joanne, Knox, Angela, Macaulay, Luke and Senewiratne, Sherrica. (2023). ‘What about me?’ : An analysis of employers’ engagement with employment service providers in Australia. Journal of Industrial Relations. 65(3), pp. 251-273. https://doi.org/10.1177/00221856231159512
Class Composition, Labour's Strategy and the Politics of Work
Thompson, Paul, Pitts, Frederick Harry, Ingold, Joanne and Cruddas, Jon. (2022). Class Composition, Labour's Strategy and the Politics of Work. Political Quarterly. 93(1), pp. 142-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.13097
Mediating the claim? How ‘local ecosystems of support’ shape the operation and experience of UK social security
Edmiston, Daniel, Robertshaw, David, Young, David, Ingold, Joanne, Gibbons, Andrea, Summers, Kate, Scullion, Lisa, Geiger, Ben Baumberg and de Vries, Robert. (2022). Mediating the claim? How ‘local ecosystems of support’ shape the operation and experience of UK social security. Social Policy and Administration : an international journal of policy and research. 56(5), pp. 775-790. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12803
Navigating pandemic social security : Benefits, employment and crisis support during COVID-19
Edmiston, Daniel, Robertshaw, David, Gibbons, Andrea, Ingold, Jo, Geiger, Ben Baumberg, Scullion, Lisa, Summers, Kate and Young, David. (2021). Navigating pandemic social security : Benefits, employment and crisis support during COVID-19 United Kingdom: Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
Claimants' experiences of the social security system during the first wave of COVID-19
Summers, Kate, Scullion, Lisa, Geiger, Ben Baumberg, Robertshaw, David, Edmiston, Daniel, Gibbons, Andrea, Karagiannaki, Eleni, de Vries, Rob and Ingold, Jo. (2021). Claimants' experiences of the social security system during the first wave of COVID-19 United Kingdom: Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC).
Activating the ‘ideal jobseeker’ : Experiences of individuals with mental health conditions on the UK Work Programme
Scholz, Frederike and Ingold, Joanne. (2021). Activating the ‘ideal jobseeker’ : Experiences of individuals with mental health conditions on the UK Work Programme. Human Relations. 74(10), pp. 1604-1627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726720934848
A Strategic Left? Starmerism, Pluralism and the Soft Left
Thompson, Paul, Pitts, Frederick Harry and Ingold, Joanne. (2021). A Strategic Left? Starmerism, Pluralism and the Soft Left. Political Quarterly. 92(1), pp. 32-39. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.12940
Collaboration is key : But is it really as easy as ‘working together’? A discussion document from the Institute of Employability Professionals
Scott, Teresa and Ingold, Jo. (2020). Collaboration is key : But is it really as easy as ‘working together’? A discussion document from the Institute of Employability Professionals London, United Kingdom: Institute of Employability Professionals.
At the edge of the safety net : Unsuccessful benefits claims at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic
Geiger, Ben Baumberg, Scullion, Lisa, Summers, Kate, Martin, Philip, Lawler, Cormac, Edmiston, Daniel, Gibbons, Andrea, Ingold, Jo, Karagiannaki, Eleni, Robertshaw, David and de Vries, Robert. (2020). At the edge of the safety net : Unsuccessful benefits claims at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic United Kingdom: The Health Foundation.
Employers' perspectives on benefit conditionality in the UK and Denmark
Ingold, Joanne. (2020). Employers' perspectives on benefit conditionality in the UK and Denmark. Social Policy and Administration: an international journal of policy and research. 54(2), pp. 236-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12552
Employer engagement in active labour market programmes in the UK and Denmark : Final report
Ingold, Jo, Sarkar, Meenakshi, Valizade, Danat, Garcia, Reece and Scholz, Frederike. (2019). Employer engagement in active labour market programmes in the UK and Denmark : Final report Leeds, United Kingdom: Centre for Employment Relations, Innovation and Change. https://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-853205
Policy practitioners' accounts of evidence-based policy making : The case of universal credit
Monaghan, Mark and Ingold, Joanne. (2019). Policy practitioners' accounts of evidence-based policy making : The case of universal credit. Journal of Social Policy. 48(2), pp. 351-368. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004727941800051X
Employer engagement in active labour market programmes : The role of boundary spanners
Ingold, Joanne. (2018). Employer engagement in active labour market programmes : The role of boundary spanners. Public Administration : An international quarterly covering public administration throughout the world. 96(4), pp. 707-720. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12545
Editorial introduction : An introduction to employer engagement in the field of HRM. Blending social policy and HRM research in promoting vulnerable groups’ labour market participation
van Berkel, Rik, Ingold, Joanne, McGurk, Patrick, Boselie, Paul and Bredgaard, Thomas. (2017). Editorial introduction : An introduction to employer engagement in the field of HRM. Blending social policy and HRM research in promoting vulnerable groups’ labour market participation. Human Resource Management Journal. 27(4), pp. 503-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12169
Employers' recruitment of disadvantaged groups : Exploring the effect of active labour market programme agencies as labour market intermediaries
Ingold, Joanne and Valizade, Danat. (2017). Employers' recruitment of disadvantaged groups : Exploring the effect of active labour market programme agencies as labour market intermediaries. Human Resource Management Journal. 27(4), pp. 530-547. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12154