Portable touchscreen assessment of motor skill : A registered report of the reliability and validity of EDNA MoTap
Journal article
McGuckian, Thomas B., Laracas, Jade, Roseboom, Nadine, Eichler, Sophie, Kardas, Szymon, Piantella , Stefan, Cole, Michael H., Eldridge, Ross, Duckworth, Jonathan, Steenbergen, Bert, Green, Dido and Wilson, Peter H.. (2025). Portable touchscreen assessment of motor skill : A registered report of the reliability and validity of EDNA MoTap. Assessment. 32(2), pp. 269-282. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241266306
Authors | McGuckian, Thomas B., Laracas, Jade, Roseboom, Nadine, Eichler, Sophie, Kardas, Szymon, Piantella , Stefan, Cole, Michael H., Eldridge, Ross, Duckworth, Jonathan, Steenbergen, Bert, Green, Dido and Wilson, Peter H. |
---|---|
Abstract | Portable and flexible administration of manual dexterity assessments is necessary to monitor recovery from brain injury and the effects of interventions across clinic and home settings, especially when in-person testing is not possible or convenient. This paper aims to assess the concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of a new suite of touchscreen-based manual dexterity tests (called EDNA™MoTap) that are designed for portable and efficient administration. A minimum sample of 49 healthy young adults will be conveniently recruited. The EDNA™MoTap tasks will be assessed for concurrent validity against standardized tools (the Box and Block Test [BBT] and the Purdue Pegboard Test) and for test–retest reliability over a 1- to 2-week interval. Correlation coefficients of r > .6 will indicate acceptable validity, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values > .75 will indicate acceptable reliability for healthy adults. The sample were primarily right-handed (91%) adults aged 19 and 34 years (M = 24.93, SD = 4.21, 50% female). The MoTap tasks did not demonstrate acceptable validity, with tasks showing weak-to-moderate associations with the criterion assessments. Some outcomes demonstrated acceptable test–retest reliability; however, this was not consistent. Touchscreen-based assessments of dexterity remain relevant; however, there is a need for further development of the EDNA™MoTap task administration. |
Keywords | dexterity; rehabilitation; finger tapping; motor assessment; reliability; validity |
Year | 2025 |
Journal | Assessment |
Journal citation | 32 (2), pp. 269-282 |
Publisher | SAGE Publications |
ISSN | 1073-1911 |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911241266306 |
PubMed ID | 39075871 |
Scopus EID | 2-s2.0-85200052756 |
PubMed Central ID | PMC11874617 |
Open access | Published as ‘gold’ (paid) open access |
Page range | 269-282 |
Funder | RMIT University |
Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (DIIS), Australian Government | |
Publisher's version | License File Access Level Open |
Output status | Published |
Publication dates | |
Online | 29 Jul 2024 |
Publication process dates | |
Deposited | 26 May 2025 |
Additional information | © The Author(s) 2024. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/91wyz/portable-touchscreen-assessment-of-motor-skill-a-registered-report-of-the-reliability-and-validity-of-edna-motap
Download files
Publisher's version
OA_McGuckian_2024_Portable_touchscreen_assessment_of_motor_skill.pdf | |
License: CC BY-NC 4.0 | |
File access level: Open |
14
total views4
total downloads10
views this month0
downloads this month