Public health–oriented intellectual property and trade policies in Africa and the regional mechanism under Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights amendment

Journal article


Adekola, T. A.. (2019). Public health–oriented intellectual property and trade policies in Africa and the regional mechanism under Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights amendment. Public Health. 173, pp. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.04.019
AuthorsAdekola, T. A.
Abstract

Objective
The short communication is prompted by the debate relating to the effect of pharmaceutical patents on access to affordable medicines, particularly in Africa. A recent amendment made to the Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS) Agreement creates a policy space for the regional alliance of low-income countries for the collective procurement and local production of drugs under compulsory licensing. This article examines the extent to which the regional mechanism can deliver access to pharmaceuticals. The article examines the regional mechanism in the light of the recent regional trade agreements and pharmaceutical plans of some regional economic blocs in Africa as well as the newly signed African Continental Free Trade Agreement (AfCFTA).

Study design
This short communication adopts a descriptive approach in linking the regional mechanism in the TRIPS amendment to the regional trade agreements of African countries at the subregional and continental levels.

Methods
To ascertain the extent to which TRIPS Agreements regional model can deliver access to medicines in Africa, the article adopts a desk review approach by examining the relevant provisions of TRIPS Agreement, particularly the newly added Article 31bis, and the provisions of the relevant regional and continental free trade agreements in Africa.

Results
The article finds that although the regional model has great prospects in supporting the wider effort to deliver access to medicine, the limitations to its operative utilization may weaken its potency in addressing the urgent public health needs of the continent.

Conclusion
The article concludes by stressing the inevitability of Africa's integration in tackling the deficiency of access to generic medicines in Africa. It was noted that even though there could be some potential challenges, the regional mechanism is indeed the way to go for low-income countries.

Keywordspublic health; TRIPS agreement; access to medicines; regional mechanism
Year2019
JournalPublic Health
Journal citation173, pp. 1-4
PublisherElsevier Ltd
ISSN0033-3506
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.04.019
PubMed ID31203136
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85067204476
Page range1-4
Publisher's version
License
All rights reserved
File Access Level
Controlled
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online13 Jun 2019
Publication process dates
Accepted27 Apr 2019
Deposited02 Jun 2025
Additional information

© 2019 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/91y21/public-health-oriented-intellectual-property-and-trade-policies-in-africa-and-the-regional-mechanism-under-trade-related-aspects-of-intellectual-property-rights-amendment

Restricted files

Publisher's version

  • 8
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 8
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Regulating genome-edited products – An international trade law perspective
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony, Ediboglu-Sakowsky, Ezgi, Endrich-Laimböck, Tobias, Graßer, Tabea, Hofmeister, Elisabeth, Wilfert, Juna Icaza and Kim, Daria. (2024). Regulating genome-edited products – An international trade law perspective. Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper Series. 16(4), pp. Paper 24-13. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4988104
When mRNA technology meets patent law : Innovation, barriers and public health
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2023). When mRNA technology meets patent law : Innovation, barriers and public health. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice. 18(12), pp. 867-877. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad086
uman rights law, intellectual property and vaccine nationalism : Lessons for the post-COVID-19 world
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony and Majekolagbe, Faith O.. (2023). uman rights law, intellectual property and vaccine nationalism : Lessons for the post-COVID-19 world. Australian Journal of Human Rights. 29(2), pp. 375-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2023.2286941
Investment robo-advisors : Some reflections on China's regulatory experience
Xiao, Shanyun and Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2021). Investment robo-advisors : Some reflections on China's regulatory experience. Banking and Finance Law Review. 37(1), pp. 127-148.
Regional mechanism under DOHA Paragraph 6 system — The largely untested alternative route for access to patented medicines
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2020). Regional mechanism under DOHA Paragraph 6 system — The largely untested alternative route for access to patented medicines. 15(1), pp. 61-90.
Should COVID-19 treatment be patented? Rethinking the theoretical justification for the grant of pharmaceutical patent
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2020). Should COVID-19 treatment be patented? Rethinking the theoretical justification for the grant of pharmaceutical patent. European Intellectual Property Review. 42(11), pp. 695-697.
Has the Doha Paragraph 6 system reached its limits?
Adekola, Tolulope. (2020). Has the Doha Paragraph 6 system reached its limits? Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice. 15(7), pp. 525-529. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa058
Abolition of graphical representation in EU trademark directive : Should countries with similar provisions follow EU’s footsteps?
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2019). Abolition of graphical representation in EU trademark directive : Should countries with similar provisions follow EU’s footsteps? Journal of Intellectual Property Rights. 24, pp. 62-68.
US–China trade war and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2019). US–China trade war and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy. 18(3), pp. 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-02-2019-0011