Pharmaceutical patent law and policy in Africa : A survey of selected SADC member states

Journal article


Mercurio, Bryan, Adekola, Tolulope Anthony and Tsega, Chimdessa Fekadu. (2023). Pharmaceutical patent law and policy in Africa : A survey of selected SADC member states. Legal Studies. 43(2), pp. 331-350. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2022.43
AuthorsMercurio, Bryan, Adekola, Tolulope Anthony and Tsega, Chimdessa Fekadu
Abstract

The paper surveys the intellectual property (IP) laws of seven Southern African Development Community countries to better understand the nature, scope, and depth of their patent laws with particular focus on their utilisation of TRIPS flexibilities to facilitate pharmaceutical access. The selected countries – Botswana, Malawi, Namibia, South Africa, Tanzania, Zambia, and Zimbabwe – represent a mix of both major and modest economies. While the current literature contains widespread assertions on the impact and effect of TRIPS on access to medicines in these countries and less-developed countries in general, this paper finds that the countries lack explicit and workable provisions implementing key TRIPS flexibilities. Hence, available TRIPS flexibilities have not been well utilised and it is often the complicated and unworkable domestic framework – rather than TRIPS – which becomes the stumbling block to pharmaceutical access. Another major finding is that patents may not be a major impediment in the region given that few patents and even fewer pharmaceutical patents are filed. The paper argues that since the surveyed countries are mainly net IP importers with similar developmental contexts and aspirations, the best approach would be to fully take advantage of existing flexibilities and more aggressively leverage policy space to engender access to cheaper medicines.

KeywordsAfrica; patent landscape; pharmaceuticals; access to medicines; TRIPS Agreement
Year2023
JournalLegal Studies
Journal citation43 (2), pp. 331-350
PublisherCambridge University Press
ISSN0261-3875
Digital Object Identifier (DOI)https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2022.43
Scopus EID2-s2.0-85164515034
Open accessPublished as ‘gold’ (paid) open access
Page range331-350
Publisher's version
License
File Access Level
Open
Output statusPublished
Publication dates
Online09 Jan 2023
Publication process dates
Accepted26 Oct 2022
Deposited13 Jun 2025
Additional information

© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Society of Legal Scholars. This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.

Permalink -

https://acuresearchbank.acu.edu.au/item/91yyv/pharmaceutical-patent-law-and-policy-in-africa-a-survey-of-selected-sadc-member-states

Download files


Publisher's version
OA_Mercurio_2023_Pharmaceutical_patent_law_and_policy_in.pdf
License: CC BY 4.0
File access level: Open

  • 0
    total views
  • 0
    total downloads
  • 0
    views this month
  • 0
    downloads this month
These values are for the period from 19th October 2020, when this repository was created.

Export as

Related outputs

Intellectual property and rare diseases : Addressing market failures through strategic frameworks
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony and Ola, Kunle. (2025). Intellectual property and rare diseases : Addressing market failures through strategic frameworks. European Intellectual Property Review. 47(4), pp. 220-227.
Intellectual property and local pharmaceutical production : Defining the need and meeting the challenge
Adekola, Tolulope. (2025). Intellectual property and local pharmaceutical production : Defining the need and meeting the challenge. In In Owoeye, Olasupo (Ed.). Contemporary issues in intellectual property law in Africa pp. 84-102 Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003491392-6
MRNA technology transfer hub and intellectual property : Towards a more equitable and sustainable model
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony and Mercurio, Bryan. (2025). MRNA technology transfer hub and intellectual property : Towards a more equitable and sustainable model. World Trade Review. 24(2), pp. 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1017/S147474562400020X
Regulating genome-edited products – An international trade law perspective
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony, Ediboglu-Sakowsky, Ezgi, Endrich-Laimböck, Tobias, Graßer, Tabea, Hofmeister, Elisabeth, Wilfert, Juna Icaza and Kim, Daria. (2024). Regulating genome-edited products – An international trade law perspective. Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition Research Paper Series. 16(4), pp. Paper 24-13. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4988104
When mRNA technology meets patent law : Innovation, barriers and public health
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2023). When mRNA technology meets patent law : Innovation, barriers and public health. Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice. 18(12), pp. 867-877. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpad086
uman rights law, intellectual property and vaccine nationalism : Lessons for the post-COVID-19 world
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony and Majekolagbe, Faith O.. (2023). uman rights law, intellectual property and vaccine nationalism : Lessons for the post-COVID-19 world. Australian Journal of Human Rights. 29(2), pp. 375-393. https://doi.org/10.1080/1323238X.2023.2286941
Compulsory licences in a regional context : An appraisal of the TRIPS Amendment's special regional treatment
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2022). Compulsory licences in a regional context : An appraisal of the TRIPS Amendment's special regional treatment. GRUR International. 71(9), pp. 822-830. https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikac075
Investment robo-advisors : Some reflections on China's regulatory experience
Xiao, Shanyun and Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2021). Investment robo-advisors : Some reflections on China's regulatory experience. Banking and Finance Law Review. 37(1), pp. 127-148.
Revisiting the public health implications of the United States-Mexico-Canada agreement [Letter]
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2020). Revisiting the public health implications of the United States-Mexico-Canada agreement [Letter]. Globalization and Health. 16(50), p. Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-020-00579-y
Regional mechanism under DOHA Paragraph 6 system — The largely untested alternative route for access to patented medicines
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2020). Regional mechanism under DOHA Paragraph 6 system — The largely untested alternative route for access to patented medicines. 15(1), pp. 61-90.
Should COVID-19 treatment be patented? Rethinking the theoretical justification for the grant of pharmaceutical patent
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2020). Should COVID-19 treatment be patented? Rethinking the theoretical justification for the grant of pharmaceutical patent. European Intellectual Property Review. 42(11), pp. 695-697.
Has the Doha Paragraph 6 system reached its limits?
Adekola, Tolulope. (2020). Has the Doha Paragraph 6 system reached its limits? Journal of Intellectual Property Law and Practice. 15(7), pp. 525-529. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpaa058
Abolition of graphical representation in EU trademark directive : Should countries with similar provisions follow EU’s footsteps?
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2019). Abolition of graphical representation in EU trademark directive : Should countries with similar provisions follow EU’s footsteps? Journal of Intellectual Property Rights. 24, pp. 62-68.
Public health–oriented intellectual property and trade policies in Africa and the regional mechanism under Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights amendment
Adekola, T. A.. (2019). Public health–oriented intellectual property and trade policies in Africa and the regional mechanism under Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights amendment. Public Health. 173, pp. 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.04.019
US–China trade war and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism
Adekola, Tolulope Anthony. (2019). US–China trade war and the WTO dispute settlement mechanism. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy. 18(3), pp. 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1108/JITLP-02-2019-0011