Loading...
Workplace democracy, exploitation, and liberalism : Why labor-managed firms are neither exploitative nor illiberal
Braun, Stephen Stewart
Braun, Stephen Stewart
Author
Abstract
[Extract] Democratic workplaces or what I call “labor-managed firms” (LMFs) have been supported by a number of theorists who believe they would lead to a more just and wholly good society that better secures equality across social positions, increased democratic engagement, opportunity for meaningful work, and autonomy. For example, Robert Dahl has famously argued that “if democracy is justified in governing the state, then it must also be justified in governing economic enterprises” (Dahl 1985, 111). Carol Gould (1988, 2014) has maintained that workplace democracy is necessary for an equal positive right to self-development (1988)/self-transformation (2014). Those sympathetic to republican thought such as Elizabeth Anderson (2017) and González-Ricoy (2014) have referenced LMFs as a way to protect workers against arbitrary interference. Andrea Veltman (2016) and Ruth Yeoman (2014) think that LMFs are important vehicles in securing the good of meaningful work. LMFs are also attractive to liberal-socialist thinkers including David Miller (1989) and David Schweickart (1996), who, to quote Miller, claim that an economy of LMFs “combine the freedom and efficiency advantages of markets with a more democratic organization of work and more equal distribution of resources” (Miller 1989, 1).
Keywords
economic democracy, exploitation, labor managed firms, liberalism, workplace democracy
Date
2022
Type
Journal article
Journal
Journal of Social Philosophy
Book
Volume
53
Issue
2
Page Range
202-220
Article Number
ACU Department
School of Philosophy
Faculty of Theology and Philosophy
Faculty of Theology and Philosophy
Collections
Relation URI
Source URL
Event URL
Open Access Status
License
All rights reserved
File Access
Controlled