Loading...
Relations Among Motivation, Executive Functions, and Reading Comprehension : Do They Differ for Students With and Without Reading Difficulties?
Cho, Eunsoo Ju, Unhee Kim, Eun Ha Lee, Minhye Lee, Garam Compton, Donald
Cho, Eunsoo
Ju, Unhee
Kim, Eun Ha
Lee, Minhye
Lee, Garam
Compton, Donald
Abstract
Purpose: We examined the extent to which achievement goals predict reading comprehension, measured by two response formats (free recall and constructed response), and how these relations differ for students with and without reading difficulties (RD). We further explored how executive functions (working memory and semantic verbal fluency) mediate the relations between achievement goals and reading comprehension.
Method: We fit multigroup structural equation models with data from monolingual English-speaking fifth graders (n = 146 for RD; n = 109 for non-RD) in the United States.
Results: Results revealed that achievement goals predict reading comprehension as measured by the free recall but not by the constructed response format, and this pattern was moderated by RD status. For students with RD, mastery goals positively predicted performance on free recall, a relationship that was completely mediated by semantic verbal fluency, whereas performance-approach goals were negatively related to free recall. For students without RD, however, achievement goals did not predict reading comprehension as measured by either assessment format.
Conclusion: Our findings underscore the need to account for motivational differences in reading comprehension and the importance of fostering mastery goals when teaching reading comprehension, particularly for students with RD.
Keywords
reading, reading comprehension, reading difficulties, English
Date
2023
Type
Journal article
Journal
Book
Volume
27
Issue
4
Page Range
289-310
Article Number
ACU Department
Faculty of Education and Arts
Collections
Relation URI
Event URL
Open Access Status
License
All rights reserved
File Access
Controlled
Notes
© 2022 Society for the Scientific Study of Reading.
his research was supported in part by Grants R324A210013 from the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) in the U.S.Department of Education to Michigan State University and Grants R324G060036 and R305A100034 from the IES toVanderbilt University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent theofficial view of IES;Institute for Education Sciences (IES) [R305A100034,R324A210013,R324G060036].306 E. CHO ET AL.
his research was supported in part by Grants R324A210013 from the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) in the U.S.Department of Education to Michigan State University and Grants R324G060036 and R305A100034 from the IES toVanderbilt University. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent theofficial view of IES;Institute for Education Sciences (IES) [R305A100034,R324A210013,R324G060036].306 E. CHO ET AL.